Szollosi v. Bishop et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: consolidation of case with 16-cv-1069 RSM. Parties to file Responses to this order no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
PAUL SZOLLOSI, Derivatively on Behalf of
Nominal Defendant JUNO THERAPEUTICS,
CASE NO. C17-1665 RSM
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
HANS E. BISHOP, et al.,
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On November 6, 2017, Plaintiff Paul
17 Szollosi filed a Cover Sheet listing as a related case Mays v. Bishop, et al., Case No. 17-cv18 1356-RSM, which in turn lists In re Juno Therapeutics, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM, as a
19 related case. See Dkt. #1-1; Case No. 17-cv-1356-RSM Dkt. #1-1. The Court has examined
20 the Complaint in this case and in Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM, and believes there is cause to
21 consolidate these matters under Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM.
In response to this Order, Plaintiff must write a short and plain statement telling the
23 Court: (1) why this case should not be consolidated with Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM; (2) if this
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1
case should not be consolidated, how it can proceed parallel to Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM; (3)
why Plaintiff is not a member of the class in Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM and therefore subject
to the restrictions discussed in Case No. 16-cv-1069-RSM, Dkt. #40. This Response may not
exceed six (6) double-spaced pages. The Court will take no further action in this case until
this Response is submitted.
Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file a Response to
this Order to Show Cause containing the detail above no later than fourteen (14) days from
the date of this Order.
DATED this 20 day of November, 2017.
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?