John Doe PLLC v. Seatree PLLC et al

Filing 97

MINUTE ORDER. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motions for relief from deadlines, docket nos. 78 , 81 , and 85 . Plaintiff's motions for partial summary judgment, docket nos. 77 , 80 , and 83 , are STAYED, and the corresponding noting dat es are STRICKEN, pending the Court's resolution of Defendants' 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, docket no. 71 . Plaintiff's motion for relief from deadline, docket no. 75 (the "Motion for Relief"), is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for excess pages, docket no. 91, is STRICKEN as moot. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (TH)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7

ICT LAW PLLC,

8
9
10
11

Plaintiff,
C17-1681 TSZ

v.
SEATREE PLLC, JAMES J. NAMIKI,
and DANIEL KALISH,

MINUTE ORDER

Defendants.
12
13

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:

14

(1)
The Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions for relief from deadlines, docket
nos. 78, 81, and 85. Plaintiff’s motions for partial summary judgment, docket nos. 77,
15
80, and 83, are STAYED, and the corresponding noting dates are STRICKEN, pending
the Court’s resolution of Defendants’ 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First
16
Amended Complaint, docket no. 71 (the “Motion to Dismiss”). This stay will be lifted
and the motions for partial summary judgment will be renoted, if appropriate, after the
17
Court rules on the Motion to Dismiss.
18

(2)
Plaintiff’s motion for relief from deadline, docket no. 75 (the “Motion for
Relief”), is DENIED. Plaintiff has filed its opposition to the Motion to Dismiss at docket
19 no. 84 and its request for relief from the deadline to respond is therefore moot.
Defendant Dan Kalish does not object to Plaintiff’s request to consider Mr. Kalish served
20 in this lawsuit and this issue is therefore also moot. See Defendants’ Opposition to
Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss First
21 Amended Complaint, docket no. 89, at 2 n.1. The Court declines to treat the Motion to
Dismiss as a motion for summary judgment.
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1

1

(3)

Plaintiff’s motion for excess pages, docket no. 91, is STRICKEN as moot.

2

(4)
record.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of

3

Dated this 3rd day of August, 2018.

4
William M. McCool
Clerk

5
6

s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2