Bailey-Medwell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER re 24 Opposition and Cross Motion. Defendants are directed to re-file its Opposition and Cross-Motion no later than June 14, 2018. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
17-1697UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
CAROL BAILEY-MEDWELL,
Plaintiff,
11
CASE NO. C17-1697-MJP
MINUTE ORDER
v.
12
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT
INSURANCE COMPANY,
13
14
Defendant.
15
16
The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha
17
J. Pechman, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s Opposition to
18
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No.
19
24) and its Objections to Evidence Submitted in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
20
Judgment, which effectively seek to strike certain portions of Plaintiff’s Motion. (Dkt. No. 24,
21
Ex. 1.)
22
Under Local Rule 7(g), “[r]equests to strike material contained in or attached to
23
submissions of opposing parties shall not be presented in a separate motion to strike, but shall
24
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
instead be included in the responsive brief, and will be considered with the underlying motion.”
2
LCR 7(g). To the extent that Defendant seeks to have its objections considered by the Court, it
3
must include them in its responsive brief. Therefore, Defendant is directed to re-file its
4
Opposition and Cross-Motion no later than June 14, 2018.
5
6
The noting date and all other dates set forth in the modified briefing schedule (Dkt. No.
17) shall remain in place.
7
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.
8
Filed June 11, 2018.
9
William M. McCool
Clerk of Court
10
s/Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?