Espinoza v. City of Seattle et al
Filing
30
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 27 Motion to Amend Complaint. Amended complaint due no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
DANIEL ESPINOZA,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
CASE NO. C17-1709JLR
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO AMEND
12
13
CITY OF SEATTLE, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
Before the court is Plaintiff Daniel Espinoza’s motion to amend his complaint.
16
(Mot. (Dkt. # 27); see also Prop. Am. Compl. (Dkt. # 28).) Defendants City of Seattle
17
and Lieutenant Thomas Mahaffey (collectively, “Defendants”) do not oppose the motion.
18
(Resp. (Dkt. # 29).) Based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) and Defendants’
19
lack of opposition, the court GRANTS Mr. Espinoza’s motion (Dkt. # 27). 1 The court
20
1
21
22
The court notes, however, that although Mr. Espinoza filed his proposed amended
complaint, he did not do so in the manner consistent with Local Civil Rule 15. (See Prop. Am.
Compl.); Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 15 (stating that a party seeking amendment “must
indicate on the proposed amended pleading how it differs from the pleading that it amends by
ORDER - 1
1
ORDERS Mr. Espinoza to file his amended complaint (Dkt. # 28) no later than fourteen
2
(14) days of the date of this order. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 15.
3
Dated this 23rd day of August, 2018.
5
A
6
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
4
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
bracketing or striking through the text to be deleted and underlining or highlighting the text to be
added”). Going forward, the court expects the parties to comply with all applicable rules and
orders and DIRECTS Mr. Espinoza’s counsel to review the Local Civil Rules for the Western
District of Washington.
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?