Ghazal v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security et al
Filing
8
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REMAND AND DISMISSAL. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice and without an award of costs to either party. Signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (TH)
U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
RHEEM GHAZAL,
Case No. C17-1710-RAJ
9
Plaintiff,
10
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REMAND
AND DISMISSAL
v.
11
12
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.;
13
Noted for consideration on:
January 17, 2018
Respondents.
14
15
JOINT STIPULATION
16
17
The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the Court may remand Plaintiff’s
naturalization application to USCIS for adjudication and issuance of a decision. The parties
18
further stipulate and agree that USCIS will render a decision on Plaintiff’s application within
19
fourteen (14) days after entry of this Order. The parties further stipulate and agree that the Court
20
21
22
may make and enter an order dismissing this case without prejudice and without costs or fees to
either party. The Court may keep jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this order.
23
//
24
//
25
//
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR REMAND AND DISMISSAL - 1
[Case No.C17-1710-RAJ]
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
206-553-7970
ORDER
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice and without an
2
award of costs to either party.
3
4
Dated this 23rd day of January, 2018.
5
6
8
A
9
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR REMAND AND DISMISSAL - 2
[Case No.C17-1710-RAJ]
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, Washington 98101-1271
206-553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?