Singleton v. Intellisist, Inc

Filing 39

ORDER denying Defendant's 33 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

_______________________________________
)
KURT SINGLETON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
INTELLISIST, INC., d/b/a Spoken
)
Communications,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)

Case No. C17-1712RSL
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the
Court Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Wrongful Discharge Claim.” Dkt. # 33.
On May 8, 2018, the Court declined to dismiss plaintiff’s wrongful discharge claim to the extent
it is based on allegations that plaintiff was terminated from his employment because he
internally reported that defendant’s practice of listening to call recordings violated the Payment
Card Industry Data Security Standards. Defendant has not shown that this decision constitutes
manifest error as required under LCR 7(h)(1). The motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

Dated this 19th day of June, 2018.

24

A

25

Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

26
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION