Collins v. Berryhill
Filing
14
ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING COMMISSIONER'S FINAL DECISION signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida, re: 13 Motion to Remand. (TF)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
BAUNWYNN A. COLLINS,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
11
12
13
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security for Operations,
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-1761-BAT
ORDER REVERSING AND
REMANDING COMMISSIONER’S
FINAL DECISION
Defendant.
The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the Commissioner’s final
14
decision should be reversed and remanded in accordance with sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §
15
405(g) and that upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge will conduct a de novo hearing and
16
further evaluate the opinion evidence; further evaluate the claimant’s maximum residual
17
functional capacity; and issue a new decision. Dkt. 13. The parties also stipulate that, upon
18
proper application, Plaintiff shall be eligible for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice
19
Act, 24 U.S.C. § 2412 et seq. Id.
20
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner’s final decision shall be
21
REVERSED AND REMANDED in accordance with sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
22
Upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge will conduct a de novo hearing and further evaluate
23
the opinion evidence; further evaluate the claimant’s maximum residual functional capacity; and
ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING COMMISSIONER’S FINAL
DECISION - 1
1
issue a new decision. Upon proper application, Plaintiff shall be eligible for attorneys’ fees under
2
the Equal Access to Justice Act, 24 U.S.C. § 2412 et seq.
3
4
5
6
DATED this 25th day of April, 2018.
A
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING COMMISSIONER’S FINAL
DECISION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?