Zellmer v. Donald R. Holbrook

Filing 26

ORDER directing Petitioner to file a response to the 21 23 Answer to Habeas Petition. Response due 7/1/2019, Optional Reply Brief due 7/8/2019. The Court RENOTES consideration of respondent's 21 23 habeas answer for 7/8/2019. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 JOEL ZELLMER, Petitioner, 9 10 11 v. DONALD R HOLBROOK, ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE A RESPONSE BY JULY 1, 2019 AND RENOTING PETITION FOR JULY 8, 2019 Respondent. 12 13 CASE NO. C17-1776 RSM-BAT The Court earlier granted petitioner’s stipulated request to extend the deadlines for the 14 remaining briefs. Dkt. 25. Petitioner’s response brief was due on June 24, 2019. Dkt. 25. 15 Petitioner has yet to file a response brief. 16 The Court presumes that petitioner’s earlier request for an extension time meant that he 17 intended on filing a response brief. The Court therefore DIRECTS petitioner to file a response to 18 the habeas answer by July 1, 2019. If he does not do so by that date, the Court will presume that 19 petitioner intends to rely only upon the argumentation in the habeas petition itself. Respondent 20 may file an optional reply brief on July 8, 2019. The Court RENOTES consideration of 21 respondent’s habeas answer for July 8, 2019. 22 /// 23 /// ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE A RESPONSE BY JULY 1, 2019 AND RENOTING PETITION FOR JULY 8, 2019 - 1 1 DATED this 25th day of June, 2019. 2 A 3 BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA Chief United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE A RESPONSE BY JULY 1, 2019 AND RENOTING PETITION FOR JULY 8, 2019 - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?