Barron v. Marriott International Inc. et al

Filing 36

ORDER granting Defendant's 33 Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Verification of Interrogatory Answers. Plaintiff shall provide verification for her answers and supplemental answers to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories within seven (7) court days of this Order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 KYM BARRON, 10 v. 11 12 Case No. C17-1801 RSM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND VERIFICATION OF INTERROGATORY ANSWERS COURTYARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and 16 Verification of Interrogatory Answers. 17 submitted, and notes that Plaintiff Kym Barron has failed to respond to this Motion. “Except for 18 motions for summary judgment, if a party fails to file papers in opposition to a motion, such 19 failure may be considered by the court as an admission that the motion has merit.” LCR 7(b)(2) 20 (“Obligation of Opponent”). The Court finds that Ms. Barron has conceded the merits of this 21 Motion, and that the requested relief is warranted under Rule 37. The Court has considered the written materials 22 It is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall supplement her responses to Defendant’s Requests for 23 Production of Documents, and produce responsive documents to Defendant within seven (7) 24 court days of this Order, as follows: 25 26  Request for Production No. 8: Plaintiff shall produce any documents related to her answer and supplemental answer to Interrogatory No. 8 supporting her claim in ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL - 1 1 paragraph 17 of the Complaint that the “staff and management” at the Property has a 2 “history of discrimination against minorities, including African Americans,” including 3 any documents related to her conversation with a union representative in the Post Office 4 or related to her conversation with a “professional colleague” that his property was stolen 5 while he was a guest at a Marriott hotel in Atlanta, Georgia. 6  Request for Production No. 9: Plaintiff shall produce documents and/or tangible items 7 that relate in any way to any of the lawsuit(s), arbitration(s), claim(s), or proceeding(s) 8 that she was asked to identify in Interrogatory No. 9 between the dates January 2014 to 9 December 2015, including records related to her claims for Social Security Disability. 10  Request for Production No. 13: Plaintiff shall produce any and all tax returns, including 11 all supporting schedules, for her and/or to the extent applicable, her marital community, 12 for each calendar year 2013 through 2017. 13  Request for Production No. 14: Plaintiff shall produce any and all documents and/or 14 tangible items related to the income and/or benefits she was asked to describe in 15 Interrogatory No. 13, including documents related to sources of income she has had since 16 January 1, 2015. 17  Request for Production No. 15: Plaintiff shall produce any and all documents and/or 18 tangible items in her possession, custody, or control that relate to any or all efforts that 19 she has made, or that have been made on her behalf (for instance, by employment 20 agencies), to obtain employment or other sources of income for herself (including self- 21 employment) since January 1, 2015. 22  Request for Production No. 16: Plaintiff shall produce any and all documents and/or 23 tangible items in her possession, custody, or control that relate to any or all applications, 24 requests, payments, and/or benefits that she was asked to describe in her answer to 25 Interrogatory No. 15 (numbered as Interrogatory 14), including applications, requests, or 26 payments for disability since January 1, 2015. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL - 2 1  Request for Production No. 20: To the extent Plaintiff intends to call a healthcare 2 provider to testify at trial or claims to have a diagnosable condition that was caused or 3 exacerbated by Defendant, Plaintiff shall produce any and all documents in her 4 possession, custody, or control related to healthcare providers who Plaintiff saw related to 5 any treatment for major depression, anxiety and post-traumatic-stress-disorder, as 6 described in her answer to Interrogatory Nos. 17 and 18, in the past 10 years, excluding 7 any documents already produced in this matter. 8  Request for Production No. 21: Plaintiff shall produce any and all documents that 9 evidence or relate to her stay at any property she was requested to identify in 10 Interrogatory No. 20, including any hotel properties where Plaintiff has stayed since 11 August 1, 2015. 12  Request for Production No. 23: Plaintiff shall produce any and all receipts evidencing any 13 purchases made by her or on her behalf to replace any item that she alleges was lost or 14 stolen at the Courtyard Hotel in Federal Way, Washington in October 2015. 15  Request for Production No. 26: Plaintiff shall produce any and all documents that 16 evidence, relate to, or refer to all communications with any third-party regarding her 17 interactions with Defendant, except any documents already produced in this matter. 18  Request for Production No. 27: Plaintiff shall produce copies of the account statements 19 of any credit card she used at any time between June 1, 2015 and December 1, 2015. 20 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide verification for her answers and 21 supplemental answers to Defendant’s First Set of Interrogatories within seven (7) court days of 22 this Order. 23 24 25 26 DATED this 22 day of October 2018. A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?