Maxill Inc. v. Loops, LLC et al

Filing 39

MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 33 Stipulated Motion to Seal; granting parties' 36 Stipulated Motion to Seal; terminating plaintiff Maxill Inc's 37 Unredacted Version of Second LCR 37 Submission; directing parties to provide co urtesy copies of their first and second LCR 37 submissions and related materials within three (3) days of the date of this minute Order; directing parties to also provide courtesy copies of their claim construction briefing and supporting documents within seven (7) days of the date of this Minute Order. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 MAXILL INC., Plaintiff, 9 10 11 C17-1825 TSZ v. LOOPS, LLC; and LOOPS FLEXBRUSH, LLC, MINUTE ORDER 12 Defendants. 13 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 14 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 15 (1) The parties’ stipulated motion to seal, docket no. 33, is GRANTED. The unredacted versions of the parties’ first submission under Local Civil Rule 37, docket 16 no. 34, and Exhibit A to the Declaration of Boyoon Choi, docket no. 34-1, shall remain under seal. 17 (2) The parties’ stipulated motion to seal, docket no. 36, is GRANTED as 18 follows. The unredacted versions of the parties’ second submission under Local Civil Rule 37, docket no. 37, and Exhibits B, C, E, F, H, and I to the Declaration of Boyoon 19 Choi, docket nos. 37-3, 37-4, 37-6, 37-7, 37-9, and 37-10, shall remain under seal. The parties have also filed under seal unredacted versions of the Declaration of Boyoon Choi, 20 Exhibits A, D, and G thereto, and their proposed order, docket nos. 37-1, 37-2, 37-5, 37-8, and 37-11, without providing any explanation for why such materials should be 21 sealed. The documents will remain sealed, however, because the same unredacted versions were also filed with the redacted version of the second LCR 37 submission, and 22 are available in the public view, see docket nos. 35-1, 35-2, 35-5, 35-8, and 35-11. 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 (3) The unredacted version of the second LCR 37 submission, docket no. 37, was improperly noted as a separate motion, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the 2 duplicative motion. The original, redacted version, docket no. 35, shall remain pending. (4) Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 10(e)(9), the parties are DIRECTED to provide courtesy copies of their first and second LCR 37 submissions and related 4 materials within three (3) days of the date of this Minute Order. Such courtesy copies shall be three-hole punched and appropriately tabbed, and they may be printed in a 5 double-sided format. 3 (5) The parties are also DIRECTED to provide courtesy copies of their claim construction briefing and supporting documents, three-hole punched and appropriately 7 tabbed, within seven (7) days of the date of this Minute Order. 6 (6) The Clerk is further DIRECTED to send a copy of this Minute Order to all 8 counsel of record. 9 Dated this 16th day of April, 2019. 10 William M. McCool Clerk 11 12 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?