Lindsey v. Shore et al

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION without prejudice and without leave to amend. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via first class mail

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

MATTHEW JAMES LINDSEY,
ESQ.,

CASE NO. C17-1841JLR
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

11
Plaintiff,
12
13

v.
DAVID SHORE, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
On January 12, 2018, the court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff Matthew James
16
Lindsey, Esq.’s 1 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). (See Order (Dkt.
17
# 5).) The court granted Mr. Lindsey leave to file an amended complaint within 14 days
18
that corrected the deficiencies in his complaint. (Id. at 6.) The court warned Mr. Lindsey
19
that if he failed to timely comply with the court’s order to file an amended complaint, the
20
21
22

1

In the caption to his complaint, Mr. Lindsey refers to himself as Matthew James
Lindsey, Esq. (Compl. (Dkt. # 4) at 1; see also id. at 6.) However, in the body of his complaint,
Mr. Lindsey also refers to himself as Matthew James Lindsey Shore. (See id. at 1, 3.)

ORDER - 1

1

court would dismiss his complaint without leave to amend. (Id.) More than 14 days has

2

passed since the court issued its January 12, 2018, order. Mr. Lindsey has failed to file

3

an amended complaint. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES Mr.

4

Lindsey’s complaint without prejudice and without leave to amend.

5

Dated this 7th day of February, 2018.

6
7

A

8

JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 2