Rose v. State of Hawaii et al
Filing
22
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 21 Second Motion to Extend Time Thirty Days: FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 4/16/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 4/23/2018, Joint Status Report due by 5/2/2018, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
XOCHI F. ROSE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. C17-1899 RSM
ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION
TO EXTEND TIME THIRTY DAYS
v.
STATE OF HAWAII, et al.,
14
15
Defendants.
16
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Extend Time Thirty
17
Days. Dkt. #21. No Defendant has appeared in this matter. Plaintiff Xochi F. Rose requests a
18
second extension of thirty days for the deadlines for the Rule 26 conference, initial disclosures,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
and submission of the Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan. Id. The Court has previously
ordered service by U.S. Marshal in this case. Dkt. #18.
The Court finds that good cause exists for granting this request as Defendants must
participate in these activities and have yet to make an appearance.
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion and the remainder of the record, the Court hereby
finds and ORDERS:
27
1) Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Extend Time Thirty Days (Dkt. #21) is GRANTED.
28
2) The following deadlines have been revised as set forth below:
ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME THIRTY DAYS - 1
1
a) Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference: 4/16/2018;
2
b) Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1): 4/23/2018;
3
c) Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f)
4
5
6
and Local Civil Rule 26(f): 5/2/2018.
3) The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail.
7
8
9
10
11
12
DATED this 16th day of March 2018.
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME THIRTY DAYS - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?