Black v. Merchants Acceptance Corp. et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER for Extension of Time. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.'s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall beextended from December 27, 2017 to January 22, 2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 KATHRYN BLACK, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 v. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MERCHANTS ACCEPTANCE CORP. and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants. 14 15 NO. 2:17-cv-01901 RSM IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the undersigned attorneys for plaintiff 16 KATHRYN BLACK and defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 17 (“Experian”), that Experian’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be 18 extended from December 27, 2017 to January 22, 2018. 19 Dated: December 26, 2017 20 REZNIK LAW OFFICE, P.C STOEL RIVES LLP By: Jonathan Baner______________ Jonathan Baner, WSBA No. 43612 30 Wall Street, 8th Floor #741 New York, NY 10005 Tel: (212) 537-9276 Email: jonathan@banerbaner.com By: s/ Rachel D. Groshong Rachel D. Groshong, WSBA No. 47021 600 University Street, Suite 3600 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 624-0900 rachel.groshong@stoel.com Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 1 (Case No. 2:17-cv-1901 RSM) STOEL RIVES LLP 95142675.1 0030176-00226 ATTORNEYS 600 University Street, Suite 3600, Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone (206) 624-0900 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 2 Dated January 2, 2018. 3 4 A 5 6 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - 2 (Case No. 2:17-cv-1901 RSM) STOEL RIVES LLP 95142675.1 0030176-00226 ATTORNEYS 600 University Street, Suite 3600, Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone (206) 624-0900

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?