Patu v. Grey et al

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 4 Report and Recommendations by Judge Richard A Jones. the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS: (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.( 2) Plaintiffs application to proceed with this action in forma pauperis (Dkt. 1) is DENIED. (3) Plaintiff is directed to pay the $400 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date on which this Order is signed. Failure to timely submit the requisite filing fee will result in immediate termination of this action.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Ricky Patu, Prisoner ID: 778665)(SG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 RICKY P. PATU, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 Case No. C17-1933-RAJ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE v. KATHY GREY, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, the Report and Recommendation of the 15 Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the 16 remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS: 17 (1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. 18 (2) Plaintiff’s application to proceed with this action in forma pauperis (Dkt. 1) is 19 DENIED. 20 (3) Plaintiff is directed to pay the $400 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date 21 on which this Order is signed. Failure to timely submit the requisite filing fee will result in 22 immediate termination of this action. 23 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 1 1 (4) 2 James P. Donohue. 3 4 5 6 The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Honorable DATED this 13th day of February, 2018. A The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?