United States of America v. McNeal et al
Filing
9
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(ST)
The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
EDMOND JOSEPH McNEAL,
20
21
(2:02-CR-00246-MJP-1)
Agreed Continuing Garnishee
Order
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
and
CAREER PATHS NW, LLC,
Garnishee.
18
19
NO. 2:17-MC-00028-RSL
A Writ of Continuing Garnishment directed to Garnishee, Career Paths
NW, LLC, has been duly issued and served upon the Garnishee. Pursuant to
22
the Writ, Garnishee Career Paths NW, LLC, filed its Answer on April 28, 2017,
23
stating that at the time of the service of the Writ, Defendant/Judgment Debtor
24
Edmond Joseph McNeal (Mr. McNeal) was an active employee who was paid
25
monthly.
26
27
28
After notification of the garnishment proceeding was mailed to the
parties on or about April 18, 2017, the Defendant/Judgment Debtor has not
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER
(USA v. Edmond Joseph McNeal & Career Paths NW, LLC,
2:17-MC-00028-RSL / 2:02-CR-00246-MJP-1) - 1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
1
requested a hearing to determine exempt property as of this date. On May 15,
2
2017, the United States filed an Agreed Motion to Issue Continuing Garnishee
3
Order, stating that it had agreed with Mr. McNeal to request a reduced
4
5
garnishment rate of 15 percent of his disposable earnings at Garnishee Career
6
Paths NW, LLC. The United States attached a Proposed Agreed Continuing
7
Garnishee Order to that effect, jointly presented with Mr. McNeal and bearing
8
his signature.
9
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:
10
11
That the Garnishee, Career Paths NW, LLC, shall pay to the United
12
States District Court for the Western District of Washington, all non-exempt
13
earnings payable to Mr. McNeal, that it has previously withheld pursuant to
14
the Writ of Garnishment;
15
That from this date forward, Garnishee Career Paths NW, LLC, shall
16
17
pay to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington,
18
15 percent of the disposable earnings, less the amount withheld for child
19
support, payable to Mr. McNeal upon each period of time when Mr. McNeal is
20
entitled to receive such funds, and shall continue said payments, if any, until
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Mr. McNeal’s debt is paid in full or until he is no longer an active employee of
Garnishee and the Garnishee no longer has possession, custody or control of
any funds due and owing to Mr. McNeal or until further order of this Court;
That such payments shall be applied to Mr. McNeal’s outstanding
obligation, by the United States District Court for the Western District of
Washington; and
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER
(USA v. Edmond Joseph McNeal & Career Paths NW, LLC,
2:17-MC-00028-RSL / 2:02-CR-00246-MJP-1) - 2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
1
That the payments shall be made out to the United States District
2
Court, Western District of Washington, referencing Case Nos. 2:02-CR-00246-
3
MJP-1 and 2:17-MC-00028-RSL, and delivered either personally or by First
4
5
6
7
8
9
Class Mail to:
United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Attn: Financial Clerk – Lobby Level
700 Stewart Street
Seattle, Washington 98101.
DATED this 1st day of June, 2017.
10
11
A
ROBERT S. LASNIK
12
United States District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
Presented by:
s/ Kyle A. Forsyth
KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609
Assistant United States Attorney
19
20
21
____________________________________
EDMOND JOSEPH McNEAL
Defendant/Judgment Debtor
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER
(USA v. Edmond Joseph McNeal & Career Paths NW, LLC,
2:17-MC-00028-RSL / 2:02-CR-00246-MJP-1) - 3
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?