Everidis Health Sciences LLC v. 123 Direct Ltd et al

Filing 9

ORDER DECLINING TO ENTER JUDGMENT by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (CDA)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

5
6
7

EVERIDIS HEALTH SCIENCES, LLC,
CAUSE NO. MC17-0033RSL
Plaintiff,

8
9
10
11

v.

ORDER DECLINING TO ENTER
JUDGMENT

123 DIRECT LTD, JOSE MANUEL
MENDEZ NAVARRO, and JEREMY
MICHAEL ROURKE-PILOTT,
Defendants,

12

v.
13

AMAZON.COM, INC.,
14

Garnishee-Defendant.
15
16

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s proposed “Judgment on Answer.” Dkt.
17

# 4. Despite the supplemental submissions received on June 6th and June 9th, it appears that the
18

judgment debtors were not served with the garnishee’s answer until it was mailed to them on
19

June 9, 2017. See RCW 6.27.190 (the answer of the garnishee is to be served as directed in the
20

writ); Dkt. # 3 (writ requires garnishee defendant to mail or deliver a copy of the answer to the
21

judgment debtors at the address provided in the writ). At the time the motion was filed and
22

continuing through today, the judgment debtors have not had twenty days in which to object to
23

the garnishment. See RCW 6.27.210 (the judgment creditor and judgment debtor have 20 days in
24

which to controvert the garnishee’s answer). The Court therefore declines to enter judgment on
25

the garnishee’s answer without prejudice to a subsequent request for judgment once the statutory
26

notice requirements are satisfied.
ORDER DECLINING TO ENTER JUDGMENT

1

Dated this 13th day of June, 2017.

2

A
Robert S. Lasnik

3

United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORDER DECLINING TO ENTER JUDGMENT

-2-