Everidis Health Sciences LLC v. 123 Direct Ltd et al

Filing 9


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 EVERIDIS HEALTH SCIENCES, LLC, CAUSE NO. MC17-0033RSL Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 v. ORDER DECLINING TO ENTER JUDGMENT 123 DIRECT LTD, JOSE MANUEL MENDEZ NAVARRO, and JEREMY MICHAEL ROURKE-PILOTT, Defendants, 12 v. 13 AMAZON.COM, INC., 14 Garnishee-Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s proposed “Judgment on Answer.” Dkt. 17 # 4. Despite the supplemental submissions received on June 6th and June 9th, it appears that the 18 judgment debtors were not served with the garnishee’s answer until it was mailed to them on 19 June 9, 2017. See RCW 6.27.190 (the answer of the garnishee is to be served as directed in the 20 writ); Dkt. # 3 (writ requires garnishee defendant to mail or deliver a copy of the answer to the 21 judgment debtors at the address provided in the writ). At the time the motion was filed and 22 continuing through today, the judgment debtors have not had twenty days in which to object to 23 the garnishment. See RCW 6.27.210 (the judgment creditor and judgment debtor have 20 days in 24 which to controvert the garnishee’s answer). The Court therefore declines to enter judgment on 25 the garnishee’s answer without prejudice to a subsequent request for judgment once the statutory 26 notice requirements are satisfied. ORDER DECLINING TO ENTER JUDGMENT 1 Dated this 13th day of June, 2017. 2 A Robert S. Lasnik 3 United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER DECLINING TO ENTER JUDGMENT -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?