Local 134 IBEW v. Apollo Video Technology

Filing 2

ORDER denying 1 Motion to Compel; the motion is denied without prejudice to a second request with proper notice to defendant by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(CDA)(cc: attorney/filer via U.S. Mail)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE _______________________________________ ) LOCAL 134, IBEW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) APOLLO VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________) Case No. MC17-0037RSL ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on Local 134, IBEW’s “Motion to Compel 14 Compliance with Subpoena.” Dkt. # 1. Plaintiff seeks to compel compliance with a subpoena 15 issued by an arbitrator in Illinois. The subpoena did not specify a return date, instead stating that 16 the documents must be delivered at Apollo Video Technology’s “earliest convenience.” Dkt. 17 # 1-1 at 1. Only twenty-one days passed between the date the subpoena was mailed to Apollo 18 and the date this motion was filed. 19 More fundamentally, there is no indication that Apollo was served with this motion or 20 otherwise given an opportunity to respond to the requested relief. The motion to compel is 21 therefore DENIED without prejudice to a second request with proper notice to defendant. 22 23 Dated this 19th day of May, 2017. 24 A 25 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 26 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?