United States of America v. Hayes et al

Filing 9

AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(CDA)cc garnishee via U.S. Mail

Download PDF
The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. BRIANNE JHANELLE HAYES, (2:07-CR-0440-1) Agreed Continuing Garnishee Order Defendant/Judgment Debtor, 15 and 16 17 NO. 2:17-MC-0052-RSL ICON INTERNATIONAL, INC., Garnishee. 18 19 20 A Writ of Continuing Garnishment directed to Garnishee, ICON 21 International, Inc., has been duly issued and served upon the Garnishee. 22 Pursuant to the Writ, Garnishee ICON International, Inc., filed its Answer on 23 24 June 8, 2017, stating that at the time of the service of the Writ, 25 Defendant/Judgment Debtor Brianne Jhanelle Hayes (Ms. Hayes) was an 26 active employee who was paid semi-monthly. 27 // 28 AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER (USA v. Brianne Jhanelle Hayes and ICON International, Inc., USDC#: 2:17-MC-0052-RSL / 2:07-CR-0440-1) - 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970 1 After notification of the garnishment proceeding was mailed to the 2 parties on or about May 31, 2017, the Defendant/Judgment Debtor has not 3 requested a hearing to determine exempt property as of this date. On June 4 5 27, 2017, the United States filed an Agreed Motion to Issue Continuing 6 Garnishee Order, stating that it had agreed with Ms. Hayes to request a 7 reduced garnishment rate of 15 percent of her disposable earnings at ICON 8 International, Inc. The United States attached a Proposed Agreed Continuing 9 Garnishee Order to that effect, jointly presented with Ms. Hayes and bearing 10 11 her signature. 12 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: 13 That Garnishee, ICON International, Inc., shall pay to the United States 14 District Court for the Western District of Washington, all non-exempt earnings 15 payable to Ms. Hayes, that it has previously withheld pursuant to the Writ of 16 17 Garnishment; 18 That from this date forward, ICON International, Inc. shall withhold and 19 pay to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, 20 15 percent of the disposable earnings payable to Ms. Hayes upon each period 21 22 23 of time when Ms. Hayes is entitled to receive such funds, and shall continue such payments, if any, until Ms. Hayes’s debt is paid in full or until she is no 24 longer an active employee of Garnishee and the Garnishee no longer has 25 possession, custody, or control of any funds due and owing to Ms. Hayes, or 26 until further order of this Court; 27 28 // AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER (USA v. Brianne Jhanelle Hayes and ICON International, Inc., USDC#: 2:17-MC-0052-RSL / 2:07-CR-0440-1) - 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970 1 That such payments shall be applied to Ms. Hayes’s outstanding 2 obligation by the United States District Court for the Western District of 3 Washington; and 4 That the payments shall be made out to the United States District 5 6 Court, Western District of Washington, referencing Case Nos. 2:07-CR-0440-1 7 and 2:17-MC-0052-RSL, and delivered either personally or by First Class Mail 8 to: 9 10 11 United States District Court, Western District of Washington Attn: Financial Clerk – Lobby Level 700 Stewart Street Seattle, Washington 98101. 12 13 Dated this 28th day of June, 2017. 14 A Robert S. Lasnik 15 United States District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 Presented by: s/ Kyle A. Forsyth KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609 Assistant United States Attorney 22 23 24 ____________________________________ BRIANNE JHANELLE HAYES Defendant/Judgment Debtor 25 26 27 28 AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER (USA v. Brianne Jhanelle Hayes and ICON International, Inc., USDC#: 2:17-MC-0052-RSL / 2:07-CR-0440-1) - 3 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?