United States of America v. Hayes et al
Filing
9
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(CDA)cc garnishee via U.S. Mail
The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
BRIANNE JHANELLE HAYES,
(2:07-CR-0440-1)
Agreed Continuing Garnishee
Order
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
15
and
16
17
NO. 2:17-MC-0052-RSL
ICON INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Garnishee.
18
19
20
A Writ of Continuing Garnishment directed to Garnishee, ICON
21
International, Inc., has been duly issued and served upon the Garnishee.
22
Pursuant to the Writ, Garnishee ICON International, Inc., filed its Answer on
23
24
June 8, 2017, stating that at the time of the service of the Writ,
25
Defendant/Judgment Debtor Brianne Jhanelle Hayes (Ms. Hayes) was an
26
active employee who was paid semi-monthly.
27
//
28
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER
(USA v. Brianne Jhanelle Hayes and ICON International, Inc.,
USDC#: 2:17-MC-0052-RSL / 2:07-CR-0440-1) - 1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
1
After notification of the garnishment proceeding was mailed to the
2
parties on or about May 31, 2017, the Defendant/Judgment Debtor has not
3
requested a hearing to determine exempt property as of this date. On June
4
5
27, 2017, the United States filed an Agreed Motion to Issue Continuing
6
Garnishee Order, stating that it had agreed with Ms. Hayes to request a
7
reduced garnishment rate of 15 percent of her disposable earnings at ICON
8
International, Inc. The United States attached a Proposed Agreed Continuing
9
Garnishee Order to that effect, jointly presented with Ms. Hayes and bearing
10
11
her signature.
12
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:
13
That Garnishee, ICON International, Inc., shall pay to the United States
14
District Court for the Western District of Washington, all non-exempt earnings
15
payable to Ms. Hayes, that it has previously withheld pursuant to the Writ of
16
17
Garnishment;
18
That from this date forward, ICON International, Inc. shall withhold and
19
pay to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington,
20
15 percent of the disposable earnings payable to Ms. Hayes upon each period
21
22
23
of time when Ms. Hayes is entitled to receive such funds, and shall continue
such payments, if any, until Ms. Hayes’s debt is paid in full or until she is no
24
longer an active employee of Garnishee and the Garnishee no longer has
25
possession, custody, or control of any funds due and owing to Ms. Hayes, or
26
until further order of this Court;
27
28
//
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER
(USA v. Brianne Jhanelle Hayes and ICON International, Inc.,
USDC#: 2:17-MC-0052-RSL / 2:07-CR-0440-1) - 2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
1
That such payments shall be applied to Ms. Hayes’s outstanding
2
obligation by the United States District Court for the Western District of
3
Washington; and
4
That the payments shall be made out to the United States District
5
6
Court, Western District of Washington, referencing Case Nos. 2:07-CR-0440-1
7
and 2:17-MC-0052-RSL, and delivered either personally or by First Class Mail
8
to:
9
10
11
United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Attn: Financial Clerk – Lobby Level
700 Stewart Street
Seattle, Washington 98101.
12
13
Dated this 28th day of June, 2017.
14
A
Robert S. Lasnik
15
United States District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
Presented by:
s/ Kyle A. Forsyth
KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609
Assistant United States Attorney
22
23
24
____________________________________
BRIANNE JHANELLE HAYES
Defendant/Judgment Debtor
25
26
27
28
AGREED CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER
(USA v. Brianne Jhanelle Hayes and ICON International, Inc.,
USDC#: 2:17-MC-0052-RSL / 2:07-CR-0440-1) - 3
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?