Board of Trustees of the Automotive Machinists Pension Trust v. Ross Island Sand & Gravel Company et al

Filing 7

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT on Garnishee Answer re 5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(CDA)

THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
AUTOMATIVE MACHINISTS PENSION
TRUST,
Plaintiff,

NO.

MS17-0057RSL

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT ON GARNISHEE ANSWER

v.
ROSS ISLAND SAND & GRAVEL CO.,
an Oregon corporation,
Defendant,
v.
WASHINGTON TRUST BANK,
GarnisheeDefendant.

Summary of Judgment
Judgment Creditor:
Judgment Debtor:
Garnishee-Defendant
Garnishment Judgment Amount:
Estimated Garnishment Costs:
Attorney for Judgment Creditor:

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT ON GARNISHEE ANSWER
Page 1 of 3

Board of Trustees of the Automotive
Machinists Pension Trust
Ross Island Sand & Gravel Co.
Washington Trust Bank
$87,571.27
$136.00
Noelle E. Dwarzski
McKenzie Rothwell Barlow & Coughran, P.S.

THIS MATTER coming on for consideration upon Plaintiff’s application of
Judgment Creditor, for judgment on the answer of Garnishee-Defendant; it appearing
that Garnishee-Defendant has filed its answer herein stating that it holds funds of the
Judgment-Debtor, Ross Island Sand & Gravel Co., in the sum of $87,707.27; that
judgment Creditor has judgment unsatisfied against the Judgment Debtor in the total
amount of $87,571.27; that Judgment Creditor’s costs in the amount of $136.00 in this
garnishment action are stated above; that more than twenty (20) days have elapsed
since service of the Writ of Garnishment and Garnishee Defendant’s answer thereto:
that signed affidavit or return of service of the Writ of Garnishment, Application for Writ
of Garnishment including a copy of the judgment entered in this action, indicating
service upon the Judgment Debtor either by Certified mail, is on file herein now,
therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
1.

Judgment Creditor shall have judgment against the GarnisheeDefendant in the sum of $87,707.27; such funds to be first applied
in satisfaction of the costs and fees taxable herein;

2.

Upon payment by Garnishee-Defendant of the aforementioned
sum to the registry of this Court, said Garnishee-Defendant shall
be discharged from this action. Upon receipt of said sum, the
Clerk of the court shall enter full satisfaction of the judgment
against Garnishee-Defendant.

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT ON GARNISHEE ANSWER
Page 2 of 3

3.

Judgment Creditor shall have judgment against the Judgment
Debtor for costs in this garnishment action in the sum of $136.00;
said sum shall be added to Judgment Creditor’s prior judgment
against Judgment Debtor.

4.

Upon receipt of the aforementioned payment from the above
Garnishee-Defendant, the clerk is authorized and directed to draw
a check on the funds on deposit in the registry of this court in the
principal amount of $87,707.27, plus all accrued interest, minus
any statutory user fees, payable to Judgment Creditor, c/o
McKenzie Rothwell Barlow & Coughran, P.S., 1325 Fourth Ave.,
Suite 910, Seattle WA 98101, and mail or deliver the check to
McKenzie Rothwell Barlow & Coughran, P.S., ATTN: Noelle E.
Dwarzski.

5.

Upon receipt of said sum, Plaintiff’s attorney shall cause an
appropriate satisfaction of judgment to be filed as to the principal
Defendant.

Dated this 17th day of August, 2017.

A
ROBERT S. LASNIK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT ON GARNISHEE ANSWER
Page 3 of 3