United States of America v. Fredericks et al

Filing 12

ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDINGS signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik re 11 Motion (CDA)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-mc-00132-RSL Document 12 Filed 03/18/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 ANTHONY R. FREDERICKS, Order Terminating Garnishment Proceeding and 15 EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC, Garnishee. 17 18 This matter came before the Court on the United States’ Application to 19 20 (2:08-CR-0278-1) Defendant/Judgment Debtor, 14 16 NO. 2:17-MC-00132-RSL Terminate Garnishment Proceeding. For the reasons stated in the United 21 States’ Application, the Court concludes that this Garnishment should be 22 terminated, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(C). 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS ORDERED that the garnishment is terminated and that Equilon Enterprises LLC is relieved of further responsibility pursuant to this garnishment. // 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v. Anthony R. Fredericks and Equilon Enterprises LLC, USDC#: 2:17-MC00132-RSL/2:08-CR-0278-1)1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970 Case 2:17-mc-00132-RSL Document 12 Filed 03/18/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Dated this 18th day of March, 2021. 2 3 JUDGE ROBERT S. LASNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 4 5 6 Presented by: 7 s/ Kyle A. Forsyth KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609 Assistant United States Attorney 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v. Anthony R. Fredericks and Equilon Enterprises LLC, USDC#: 2:17-MC00132-RSL/2:08-CR-0278-1)2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?