Williams v PRK Funding Services Inc et al
Filing
70
ORDER striking Plaintiff's 63 Motion for Error Coram Nobis Residant, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS,
Case No. C18-48RSM
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
11
PRK FUNDING SERVICES, INC., et al.,
12
MINUTE ORDER STRIKING
PLAINTIFF’S WRIT OF ERROR CORAM
NOBIS RESIDANT
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge:
On April 18, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Writ of Error Coram Nobis Residant. Dkt. #63. Writs
of coram nobis have been expressly abolished in civil cases by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
18
60(e). Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(e) (“The following are abolished: . . . writs of coram nobis.”).
19
20
The Court accordingly interprets Plaintiff’s filing as a motion for reconsideration of the
21
Court’s earlier orders denying several motions for default. Dkts. #38, 40. Those Orders were
22
filed on March 28 and March 29, 2018.
23
reconsideration shall be plainly labeled as such” and “shall be filed within fourteen days after the
24
order to which it relates is filed.” LCR 7(h)(2). As such, motions for reconsideration of the
25
Pursuant to Local Rule 7(h), “a motion for
Court’s earlier orders had to be filed no later than April 11 and April 12, 2018, respectively.
26
27
MINUTE ORDER – 1
1
Because Plaintiff’s motion is not clearly identified as a motion for reconsideration and
2
because the motions are untimely filed, the Court hereby STRIKES Plaintiff’s Writ of Error
3
Coram Nobis Residant (Dkt. #63).
4
5
6
Plaintiff is once again reminded that the Court expects him to be familiar with this Court’s
Local Rules, which can be found and accessed on the Court’s public website.
DATED this 20th day of April, 2018.
7
8
A
9
10
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
MINUTE ORDER – 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?