Bueing v. U.S. Bank National Association ND et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 7 Motion Seeking Injunctive Relief Restraining the Foreclosure Sale of Property; Plaintiff to submit monthly payments to the Court registry; Defendants are ordered to SHOW CAUSE on or before 2/5/2018 why the Court should not convert this temporary restraining order to a preliminary injunction, signed by Judge Richard A Jones. (SWT) (cc: Finance)

1
2

HONORABLE RICHARD A JONES

3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

9
10
11
12

ANGELA BUEING,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

CASE NO. C18-54 RAJ
ORDER

v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION ND, et al.,

17

Defendants.

18
19

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion Seeking Injunctive

20 Relief Restraining the Foreclosure Sale of Property. Dkt. # 7. Defendant Quality Loan
21 Service Corp. of Washington (“Quality”) “takes no position on the motion other than the
22 instant non-judicial foreclosure has been advanced in accordance with the requirement of
23 the Deed of Trust Act . . . .” Dkt. # 14. Defendant U.S. Bank (“USB”) received service
24
25
26
27

ORDER- 1

1 of the Motion, and the Court specifically requested a response, Dkt. # 9, but USB failed
2 to respond. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 1
3

To obtain preliminary injunctive relief, Plaintiff must “establish that [she] is likely

4 to succeed on the merits, that [she] is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of
5 preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in [her] favor, and that an injunction is
6 in the public interest.” Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 365,
7 374 (2008). The standard for a temporary restraining order is substantially the same.
8 ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. Courage Campaign, 680 F. Supp. 2d 1225, 1228
9 (E.D. Cal. 2010) (citing Winter); Stuhlbarg Int’l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240
10 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001) (noting that preliminary injunction and temporary
11 restraining order standards are “substantially identical”).
12

Plaintiff showed that she is likely to succeed on her claim under Washington’s

13 Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”). A CPA claim requires proof of five elements: “(1)
14 unfair or deceptive act or practice; (2) occurring in trade or commerce; (3) public interest
15 impact; (4) injury to plaintiff in his or her business or property; (5) causation.” Hangman
16 Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title Ins. Co., 719 P.2d 531, 533 (Wash. 1986).
17 “[A] claim under the Washington CPA may be predicated upon a per se violation of
18 statute, an act or practice that has the capacity to deceive substantial portions of the
19 public, or an unfair or deceptive act or practice not regulated by statute but in violation of
20 public interest.” Klem v. Washington Mut. Bank, 295 P.3d 1179, 1187 (Wash. 2013).
21

Plaintiff states that USB deceived her into defaulting on payments, suggesting that

22 this would lead her to be eligible for a loan modification program. Dkt. # 1 (Complaint)
23 at ¶ 15. However, USB never accepted Plaintiff’s loan modification applications. Id. at
24 ¶¶ 16, 21. Plaintiff claims that USB’s actions have caused her loan to grow and interest
25 to accrue at a larger rate. Id. at ¶ 27. The Court finds that USB’s alleged behavior carries
26
27

1

The Court premises its Order on the alleged actions by USB, not by the Trustee.

ORDER- 2

1 a negative public interest impact. Though given the opportunity, USB does not dispute
2 these claims and therefore the Court considers this an admission that Plaintiff’s claim has
3 merit. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(b)(2). 2
4

Plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm if the foreclosure sale, scheduled for February

5 16, 2018, see Dkt. # 14 at 3, proceeds as scheduled. Moreover, the Court finds that the
6 balance of equities tips in Plaintiff’s favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.
7 Accordingly, the Court issues a temporary restraining order enjoining the non8 judicial foreclosure sale of the real property commonly known as 5700 141st St.,
9 S.W., Edmonds, Washington 98026. 3
10

Plaintiff asks the Court to waive the requirement to submit her monthly payments

11 to the Court registry. The Court declines the request and orders Plaintiff to submit
12 her monthly payments of $2,666.00 to the Court registry as required by RCW
13 61.24.130(1). The Court orders Plaintiff to submit her first payment immediately
14 upon receipt of this Order to satisfy her payment burden from January. Plaintiff’s
15 next payment is due on or before February 15, 2018, and she will be expected to
16 submit payments on or before the 15th of each month while this Order is in place.
17

The temporary restraining order will become effective upon formal service of this

18 order and will remain in effect pending further order of this Court. Defendants are
19
20
21

2

25

3

USB, after being properly served in this matter and after being informed that the Court
22 expected a response to the pending Motion, failed to file any responsive pleading. See Local
Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(b)(2) (“Except for motions for summary judgment, if a party fails to
23 file papers in opposition to a motion, such failure may be considered by the court as an
admission that the motion has merit.”). Due to this failure, the Court finds that Plaintiff has met
24 her burden at this stage and the Court will issue a temporary restraining order.
The Court need only find likelihood of success on one claim. For the purpose of this

26 Motion, Plaintiff carried her burden on her CPA claim, and therefore the Court need not analyze
the remaining claims at this time. See League of Wilderness Defs./Blue Mountains Biodiversity

27 Project v. Connaughton, 752 F.3d 755, 760 (9th Cir. 2014).

ORDER- 3

1 ordered to show cause on or before February 5, 2018 why the Court should not
2 convert this temporary restraining order to a preliminary injunction.
3

Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2018.

4

A

5
6

The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

ORDER- 4