Le et al v. Urquart et al

Filing 221

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 218 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint: Plaintiffs will be allowed to file a Third Amended Complaint asserting a negligence claim in light of the recent decision i n Beltran-Serrano v. City of Tacoma, 193 Wn.2d 537, 442 P.3d 608 (2019). The Court will set deadlines for the filing of such amended pleading, the filing of any responsive pleading or motion, and the completion of any related discovery after the a ppeal in this matter is resolved and the stay imposed by the Order entered June 4, 2019, docket no. 209, is lifted. Plaintiffs' request to lift the stay and permit them to immediately file their proposed Third Amended Complaint is DENIED. P laintiffs' proposed Third Amended Complaint, docket nos. 218-2 (redlined) & 218-3, attempts to resurrect claims that have already been dismissed. With the exception of the negligence claim, as to which plaintiffs contend a change in the law has transpired, plaintiffs may not, by amending their pleadings, reinstate claims that were previously dismissed. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(MW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 8 BAO XUYEN LE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Tommy Le; HOAI “SUNNY” LE; and DIEU HO, Plaintiffs, 9 10 11 12 C18-55 TSZ v. MINUTE ORDER REVEREND DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. COUNTY; and KING COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF CESAR MOLINA, 13 Defendants. 14 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 15 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend, docket no. 218, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows. (a) Plaintiffs will be allowed to file a Third Amended Complaint asserting a negligence claim in light of the recent decision in Beltran-Serrano v. City of Tacoma, 193 Wn.2d 537, 442 P.3d 608 (2019). The Court will set deadlines for the filing of such amended pleading, the filing of any responsive pleading or motion, and the completion of any related discovery after the appeal in this matter is resolved and the stay imposed by the Order entered June 4, 2019, docket no. 209, is lifted. (b) Plaintiffs’ request to lift the stay and permit them to immediately file their proposed Third Amended Complaint is DENIED. Plaintiffs’ proposed Third Amended Complaint, docket nos. 218-2 (redlined) & 218-3, attempts to resurrect 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 claims that have already been dismissed. See Minute Order (docket no. 38) (dismissing claim for reckless or negligent infliction of emotional distress, which plaintiffs have tried to replead as the Fifth Cause of Action in the proposed Third Amended Complaint); Stip. & Order (docket no. 65) (dismissing claim for negligent selection, training, and supervision, which is set forth as the Sixth Cause of Action in the proposed Third Amended Complaint); Stip. & Order (docket no. 90) (approving non-suit of Julia Nguyen, who is named as a plaintiff in the proposed Third Amended Complaint); Minute Order (docket no. 143) (dismissing the equal protection / racially-selective law enforcement claim that appears within the First Cause of Action in the proposed Third Amended Complaint); Order (docket no. 189) (dismissing claim for outrage, identified as the Fourth Cause of Action in the proposed Third Amended Complaint, and terminating as plaintiffs Uyen Le, Kim Tuyet Le, Quoc Nguyen, Tam Nguyen, Dung Nguyen, and Jefferson Ngyuen aka Jefferson Ho, who are listed in the caption of the proposed Third Amended Complaint). With the exception of the negligence claim, as to which plaintiffs contend a change in the law has transpired, plaintiffs may not, by amending their pleadings, reinstate claims that were previously dismissed. (2) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of Dated this 2nd day of December, 2019. 12 William M. McCool Clerk 13 14 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?