Le et al v. Urquart et al
Filing
245
MINUTE ORDER: The scheduling conference set for 9/24/2020, at 10:30 a.m., is STRICKEN; however, a status conference concerning discovery and the related disputes outlined in the 244 Joint Status Report is SET for 10/15/2020, at 10:30 a.m. The Court hereby SETS the following dates and deadlines: Jury Trial (10-15 days) is set for 4/19/2021 before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Discovery completed by 2/1/2021, Dispositive motions due by 2/11/2021, Motions in Limine due by 3/18/2021, Agreed Modified Pretrial Order due by 4/2/2021, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 4/2/2021, Pretrial Conference set for 4/9/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (LH)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
4
5
6
7
BAO XUYEN LE, as Personal
Representative of the Estate of Tommy Le;
HOAI “SUNNY” LE; and DIEU HO,
Plaintiffs,
8
C18-55 TSZ
v.
9
10
11
REVEREND DR. MARTIN LUTHER
KING, JR. COUNTY; and KING
COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF CESAR
MOLINA,
12
13
14
MINUTE ORDER
Defendants.
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
(1)
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report, docket no. 244, the Court
15 is persuaded that a scheduling conference is unnecessary. The scheduling conference set
for September 24, 2020, at 10:30 a.m., is therefore STRICKEN; however, a status
16 conference concerning discovery and the related disputes outlined in the Joint Status
Report is SET for October 15, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Instructions for participating in the
17 status conference via the ZoomGov.com platform will be provided by email to counsel.
18
19
(2)
The Court hereby SETS the following dates and deadlines:
April 19, 2021
Discovery completion deadline
February 1, 2021
Dispositive motions filing deadline
20
JURY TRIAL DATE (10-15 days)
February 11, 2021
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
Additional motions in limine 1 filing deadline
Agreed modified Pretrial Order 2 due
4
5
6
April 2, 2021
Pretrial Conference
3
April 2, 2021
Supplemental trial briefs, additional proposed
voir dire questions, and additional proposed jury
instructions due
2
March 18, 2021
April 9, 2021
at 10:00 a.m.
(3)
7 record.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
Dated this 21st day of September, 2020.
8
9
William M. McCool
Clerk
10
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1
The motions in limine deferred by Minute Order entered May 28, 2019, docket no. 192, remain
deferred to the Pretrial Conference.
2
The Agreed Pretrial Order shall be filed in CM/ECF and shall also be attached as a Word
compatible file to an e-mail sent to the following address: ZillyOrders@wawd.uscourts.gov.
Notwithstanding Local Civil Rule 16.1, the exhibit list shall be prepared in table format with the
following columns: “Exhibit Number,” “Description,” “Admissibility Stipulated,” “Authenticity
Stipulated/Admissibility Disputed,” “Authenticity Disputed,” and “Admitted.” The latter
column is for the Clerk’s convenience and shall remain blank, but the parties shall indicate the
status of an exhibit’s authenticity and admissibility by placing an “X” in the appropriate column.
Duplicate documents shall not be listed twice: once a party has identified an exhibit in the
Pretrial Order, any party may use it. Notwithstanding any prior rulings of the Court, plaintiffs’
exhibits shall be numbered consecutively beginning with 1; defendant King County’s exhibits
shall be numbered consecutively beginning with the next multiple of 100 after plaintiffs’ last
exhibit, and defendant Molina’s exhibits shall be numbered consecutively beginning with the
next multiple of 100 after defendant King County’s last exhibit. For example, if plaintiffs’ last
exhibit is numbered 159, then defendant King County’s exhibits shall begin with the number
200; if defendant King County’s last exhibit number is 321, then defendant Molina’s exhibits
shall begin with the number 400.
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?