Le et al v. Urquart et al

Filing 261

MINUTE ORDER granting Defendants' 257 Motion to Amend Answers: Within seven (7) days of the date of this Minute Order, defendant King County may electronically file an amended answer adding, with respect to plaintiffs' negligence cl aim, the affirmative defenses of assumption of risk and comparative negligence, and defendant Deputy Cesar Molina may electronically file an amended answer adding, with respect to plaintiffs' negligence claim, the affirmative defense of assumption of risk. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(MW)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00055-TSZ Document 261 Filed 02/10/21 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 4 5 6 BAO XUYEN LE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Tommy Le; HOIA “SUNNY” LE; and DIEU HO, 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, C18-55 TSZ v. REVEREND DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. COUNTY; and KING COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF CESAR MOLINA, MINUTE ORDER Defendants. 12 13 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: 14 (1) Defendants’ unopposed motion, docket no. 257, for leave to amend their answers is GRANTED as follows. Within seven (7) days of the date of this Minute 15 Order, defendant King County may electronically file an amended answer adding, with respect to plaintiffs’ negligence claim, the affirmative defenses of assumption of risk and 16 comparative negligence, and defendant Deputy Cesar Molina may electronically file an amended answer adding, with respect to plaintiffs’ negligence claim, the affirmative 17 defense of assumption of risk. 18 19 (2) record. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of Dated this 9th day of February, 2021. 20 William M. McCool Clerk 21 22 s/Gail Glass Deputy Clerk 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?