Anderson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co et al

Filing 41

ORDER granting parties' 40 Renewed Stipulated Motion to Extend Trial Schedule. Jury Trial is continued to 6/3/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Motions in Limine due by 5/6/2019, Pretrial Order due by 5/22/2019, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 5/29/2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 MUFFIN ANDERSON, 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. No. 2:18-cv-00073-RSM ORDER GRANTING RENEWED STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL SCHEDULE JP Morgan Chase & Co., a corporation; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., a Utah Corporation; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, a California Corporation; and DOES 1 THROUGH X, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THIS MATTER came before the Court pursuant to a renewed joint motion by Plaintiff and Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) to extend the trial date and related pretrial dates in accordance with the schedule set forth below. Having considered the stipulated motion, the Court finds that there is good cause to extend the trial date and related pre-trial dates as requested in the renewed joint motion as follows: // // // // 26 ORDER GRANTING RENEWED STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DATES (No. 2:18-cv-00073-RSM) - 1 99616608.1 0052161-05596 1 2 3 4 5 Motions in limine Agreed pretrial order Trial briefs, jury instructions, etc. Trial (5-7 days, jury) New Deadlines 5/6/19 5/22/19 5/29/19 6/3/19 IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of December, 2018. 6 7 8 A 9 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING RENEWED STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TRIAL DATE AND RELATED PRE-TRIAL DATES (No. 2:18-cv-00073-RSM) - 2 99616608.1 0052161-05596

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?