Burke v. Professional Transportation, Inc

Filing 36

ORDER striking without prejudice plaintiff's 34 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 GERALDINE BURKE, Plaintiff, 11 v. CASE NO. C18-0081JLR ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO COMPEL 12 13 PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC., 14 Defendant. 15 Before the court is Plaintiff Geraldine Burke’s motion to compel discovery. (Mot. 16 (Dkt # 34).) The court STRIKES the motion without prejudice to refiling in conformity 17 with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court’s Local Civil Rules, and the court’s 18 prior orders in this matter. 19 First, Ms. Burke filed her motion without initially requesting a conference with the 20 court. (See Dkt.) The motion therefore contravenes the court’s April 9, 2018, scheduling 21 order. (See Sched. Order (Dkt. # 15) at 2 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3)(B)(v)) 22 ORDER - 1 1 (“[P]ursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court ‘direct[s] that before 2 moving for an order relating to discovery, the movant must request a conference with the 3 court’ by notifying [the courtroom deputy] . . . .” (second alteration in original))); see 4 also Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3)(B)(v) (permitting the court, in its scheduling order, to 5 “direct that before moving for an order relating to discovery, the movant must request a 6 conference with the court”). 7 Second, the court’s scheduling order set a deadline of January 25, 2019, for the 8 filing of all motions related to discovery. (See Sched. Order at 2.) Therefore, to file such 9 a motion after this deadline, Ms. Burke must first demonstrate good cause for modifying 10 the court’s scheduling order and seek the court’s consent. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) 11 (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.”) Ms. 12 Burke has done neither here. (See generally Dkt.; see also Mot.) The court therefore 13 STRIKES Ms. Burke’s motion to compel discovery (Dkt. # 34) without prejudice to 14 renewing the motion in a manner that comports with the Federal Rules of Civil 15 Procedure, the court’s Local Civil Rules, and prior orders of this court. 16 Dated this 8th day of March, 2019. 17 18 A 19 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?