Burke v. Professional Transportation, Inc
Filing
36
ORDER striking without prejudice plaintiff's 34 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
GERALDINE BURKE,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
CASE NO. C18-0081JLR
ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO
COMPEL
12
13
PROFESSIONAL
TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
14
Defendant.
15
Before the court is Plaintiff Geraldine Burke’s motion to compel discovery. (Mot.
16
(Dkt # 34).) The court STRIKES the motion without prejudice to refiling in conformity
17
with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court’s Local Civil Rules, and the court’s
18
prior orders in this matter.
19
First, Ms. Burke filed her motion without initially requesting a conference with the
20
court. (See Dkt.) The motion therefore contravenes the court’s April 9, 2018, scheduling
21
order. (See Sched. Order (Dkt. # 15) at 2 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3)(B)(v))
22
ORDER - 1
1
(“[P]ursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the Court ‘direct[s] that before
2
moving for an order relating to discovery, the movant must request a conference with the
3
court’ by notifying [the courtroom deputy] . . . .” (second alteration in original))); see
4
also Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3)(B)(v) (permitting the court, in its scheduling order, to
5
“direct that before moving for an order relating to discovery, the movant must request a
6
conference with the court”).
7
Second, the court’s scheduling order set a deadline of January 25, 2019, for the
8
filing of all motions related to discovery. (See Sched. Order at 2.) Therefore, to file such
9
a motion after this deadline, Ms. Burke must first demonstrate good cause for modifying
10
the court’s scheduling order and seek the court’s consent. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4)
11
(“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.”) Ms.
12
Burke has done neither here. (See generally Dkt.; see also Mot.) The court therefore
13
STRIKES Ms. Burke’s motion to compel discovery (Dkt. # 34) without prejudice to
14
renewing the motion in a manner that comports with the Federal Rules of Civil
15
Procedure, the court’s Local Civil Rules, and prior orders of this court.
16
Dated this 8th day of March, 2019.
17
18
A
19
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?