Thorson v. United States of America

Filing 16

ORDER denying without prejudice Petitioner's 15 Motion to Amend § 2255 Petition. Petitioner, if he so chooses, may file another motion for leave to amend his petition as soon as practical following resolution of his direct appeal. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (TH) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 ROBERT D. THORSON, Petitioner, 9 10 11 CASE NO. C18-136RSM ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Respondent. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Amend § 2255 Petition. Dkt. #15. Petitioner’s Motion provides, simply: Comes now the Petitioner and moves this Court for leave to amend Petitioner’s § 2255 Petition, Pursuant to the Courts [sic] Order filed April 11, 2018. See Dkt. #9. Dkt. #15. The Court’s April 11, 2018 Order stayed this matter pending resolution of Petitioner’s 21 direct appeal. Dkt. #9. The Court subsequently ordered that it would not “consider further filings 22 from Petitioner until the status of Petitioner’s direct appeal warrants lifting the stay in this 23 matter.” Dkt. #14. 24 25 Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS that Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Amend § 2255 Petition (Dkt. #15) is DENIED without prejudice. Petitioner, if he so chooses, 26 27 ORDER – 1 1 2 may file another motion for leave to amend his petition as soon as practical following resolution of his direct appeal. 3 The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Robert D. Thorson, 4 No. 48042-086, FCI-Sheridan, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 5000, Sheridan, OR 5 6 97378. DATED this 28 day of August, 2018. 7 A 8 9 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ORDER – 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?