Countryman v. Doe et al

Filing 11

ORDER directing Defendant Davis Shows NW, Inc. to respond jointly to all of the issues raised in both the court's order and Ms. Countryman's 8 motion. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 BREONNA COUNTRYMAN, 10 Plaintiff, 11 CASE NO. C18-0187JLR ORDER v. 12 JOHN DOE, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On February 22, 2018, the court entered an order directing Defendant Davis 16 Shows NW, Inc. (“Davis Shows”) to show cause demonstrating compliance with 28 17 U.S.C. § 1446(b) and demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount 18 in controversy exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs, under 28 U.S.C. 19 §1332(a). (Order (Dkt. # 10).) Shortly before the court’s order posted on the docket, 20 Plaintiff Breonna Countryman filed a motion to remand based on similar but not identical 21 grounds. (See Mot. (Dkt. # 8); see also Dkt.) 22 // ORDER - 1 1 The court therefore ORDERS Davis Shows to respond jointly to all of the issues 2 raised in both the court’s order and Ms. Countryman’s motion within the page limits 3 provided by the local rules. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 7(e)(3). Davis Shows 4 may submit its joint response according to the schedule for motions provided by the local 5 rules, rather than the time specified in the court’s order. See id. LCR 7(d)(3); (Order at 6 4.) 7 Dated this 23rd day of February, 2018. 8 9 A 10 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?