College Republicans of the University of Washington et al v. Cauce et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER re parties' 55 Stipulated MOTION for Sixty-Day Continuance of Preliminary Injunction Hearing and Sixty Day Extension to File FRCP 26(f) Report. The Preliminary Injunction hearing is scheduled for June 19, 2018. The FRCP 26(f) report is due July 3, 2018. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)

Download PDF
Honorable Marsha J. Pechman 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 COLLEGE REPUBLICANS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON; and CHEVY SWANSON, an Individual, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs, v. ANA MARI CAUCE, individually and in her official capacity as president of the University of Washington; GERALD J. BALDASTY, individually and in his official capacity as provost and executive vice president; RENE SINGLETON, individually and in her official capacity as assistant director, Student Activities; CHRISTINA COOP, individually and in her official capacity as senior activities advisor, Student Activities; JOHN N. VINSON, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of the University of Washington, Seattle, Police Department; CRAIG WILSON individually and in his official capacity as University of Washington, Seattle, Police Department Patrol Commander; and DOES 1-25; No. 2:18-CV-00189 MJP STIPULATED MOTION FOR SIXTY DAY CONTINUANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING AND SIXTY DAY EXTENSION TO FILE FRCP 26(f) REPORT NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: APRIL 11, 2018 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATED MOTION FOR 60 DAY CONTINUANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING AND SIXTY DAY EXTENSION TO FILE FRCP 26(f) REPORT (Case No. 2:18-CV-00189 MJP) 1 STIPULATION 2 Plaintiffs College Republicans of the University of Washington and Chevy Swanson and 3 4 Defendants (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and jointly move for a sixty-day continuance of the Preliminary Injunction hearing currently set 5 6 7 8 9 for April 17, 2018, so that the Parties may engage in discussions to reach agreement and resolve the pending case. For the same purpose, the Parties also stipulate and jointly move for a sixtyday extension of time to file the FRCP 26(f) report, which is currently due April 17, 2018. The new date for the Preliminary Injunction hearing is subject to the Court’s availability. 10 11 STIPULATED TO this 11th day of April, 2018. 12 13 14 15 16 17 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP FREEDOM X By s/ Paul J. Lawrence Paul J. Lawrence, WSBA # 13557 Jamie L. Lisagor, WSBA # 39946 By s/ William J. Becker, Jr. William J. Becker, Jr. (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendants ELLIS, LI & McKINSTRY PLLC Kyle D. Netterfield, WSBA #27101 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATED MOTION FOR 60 DAY CONTINUANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING AND SIXTY DAY EXTENSION TO FILE FRCP 26(f) REPORT (Case No. 2:18-CV-00189 MJP) 1 ORDER 2 3 Based upon the above stipulated motion, the Court continues the Preliminary Injunction 4 hearing for sixty days and extends the time to file the FRCP 26(f) report by sixty days. The 5 Preliminary Injunction hearing is scheduled for June 19, 2018. The FRCP 26(f) report is due 6 July 3, 2018. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2018. 8 A 9 10 Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 Presented by: PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 15 16 17 18 By s/ Paul J. Lawrence Paul J. Lawrence, WSBA # 13557 Jamie L. Lisagor, WSBA # 39946 Attorneys for Defendants 19 20 FREEDOM X 21 22 By s/ William J. Becker, Jr. William J. Becker, Jr. (admitted Pro Hac Vice) 23 24 ELLIS, LI & McKINSTRY PLLC Kyle D. Netterfield, WSBA #27101 25 26 27 Attorneys for Plaintiffs STIPULATED MOTION FOR 60 DAY CONTINUANCE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING AND SIXTY DAY EXTENSION TO FILE FRCP 26(f) REPORT (Case No. 2:18-CV-00189 MJP)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?