Lakew v. Safeway Inc et al

Filing 21

MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff's 14 Motion to continue the motion for summary judgment 9 . Defendant Safeway's 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment is RENOTED to 2/15/2019; Plaintiff's supplemental response due 2/8/2019; reply due 2/ 15/2019. Parties directed to file a Joint Status Report within 21 days of this Minute Order indicating (i) whether the Doe defendant can be and/or has been identified, (ii) whether any inability to identify the Doe defendant is related to the alleged spoliation of evidence, and (iii) whether plaintiff's claim against the Doe defendant should be dismissed (either with or without prejudice). Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 WORKNESH LAKEW, 8 9 10 Plaintiff, C18-237 TSZ v. MINUTE ORDER SAFEWAY, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 13 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Plaintiff’s motion, docket no. 14, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d), to continue the motion for summary judgment brought by defendant Safeway, Inc. (“Safeway”) is GRANTED. Safeway’s motion for summary judgment, 15 docket no. 9, is RENOTED to February 15, 2019. Plaintiff may file a supplemental response, not to exceed twelve (12) pages in length, along with any supporting materials, 16 on or before February 8, 2019. Safeway may file a supplemental reply, not to exceed six (6) pages in length, by the new noting date. 17 (2) Although plaintiff made an accusation, in response to Safeway’s motion for 18 summary judgment, that Safeway has spoliated evidence, plaintiff has not yet filed and properly noted a motion seeking remedies for any spoliation, and the Court declines to 19 address the issue at this time. The Court observes, however, that plaintiff has named as a Doe defendant the individual who allegedly caused the spill at issue. The Court also 20 observes that the deadlines for joining additional parties and amending pleadings have expired. The parties are DIRECTED to meet and confer and to file a Joint Status Report, 21 within twenty-one 21 days of the date of this Minute Order, indicating (i) whether the Doe defendant can be and/or has been identified, (ii) whether any inability to identify the 22 14 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 1 Doe defendant is related to the alleged spoliation of evidence, and (iii) whether plaintiff’s claim against the Doe defendant should be dismissed (either with or without prejudice). 2 (3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 3 record. 4 Dated this 24th day of October, 2018. 5 William M. McCool Clerk 6 s/Karen Dews Deputy Clerk 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?