LVB-Ogden Marketing LLC v. Bingham et al
Filing
242
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 225 Motion for Order Requiring Compliance with Court's January 9, 2019 Discovery Order, Dkt. 211 . Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (SWT)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
4
5
6
LVB-OGDEN MARKETING, LLC,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
v.
DAVID S. BINGHAM, SHARON
BINGHAM, CHRISTOPHER BINGHAM,
CHERISH BINGHAM, KELLY
BINGHAM, BINGO INVESTMENTS,
LLC, CCRB ENTERPRISES, LLC, SKBB
ENTERPRISES, LLC, PARK PLACE
MOTORS, LTD., HYTECH POWER, INC.,
HENRY DEAN, in his individual capacity
and as Trustee for the SHARON GRAHAM
BINGHAM 2007 TRUST, and BGH
HOLDINGS, LLC,
CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00243-TSZ
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ORDER
REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH
DKT. 211
Defendants.
On January 9, 2019, the undersigned granted the motion to compel (Dkt. 178) of Plaintiff
17
LVB-Ogden Marketing, LLC (“LVB”) Dkt. 211. Pursuant to the Court’s Order, Defendants
18
David S. Bingham, Sharon Bingham, Christopher Bingham, Cherish Bingham, Kelly Bingham
19
(the “Bingham Defendants”), Bingo Investments, LLC (“Bingo”), CCRB Enterprises, LLC
20
(“CCRB”), SSKB Enterprises, LLC (“SSKB”), Park Place Motors, Ltd. (“Park Place”), Hytech
21
Power, Inc. (“HTP” or “HyTech”), and Henry Dean, as Trustee for the Sharon Graham Bingham
22
2007 Trust (“the Trustee”) were ordered, inter alia, to produce by January 14, 2019, complete
23
answers to specified interrogatories and produce all non-privileged documents within their
possession, custody, or control. The Trustee was required to submit a privilege log for any
1
documents withheld on the basis of privilege. Id., ¶ 8. Defendants were also ordered to certify
2
under penalty of perjury: (i) which email accounts were searched (and that those accounts have
3
been preserved) and each step taken to conduct such search; (ii) the date range of such search;
4
and (iii) that all responsive communications and documents in their possession, custody, and
5
control have been produced. Id., ¶ 11.
6
On January 15, 2019, LVB filed an ex parte motion for an order (1) compelling
7
Defendants to comply immediately with the Court’s January 9, 2019 discovery order; (2)
8
permitting LVB to seek additional costs and attorneys’ fees for having to bring the motion; and,
9
(3) extending the expert discovery period so that LVB’s expert can supplement her report to
10
account for the untimely discovery. Dkt. 225, p. 2. This motion was referred to the undersigned
11
by the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)A) and Local Magistrate
12
Judge’s Rule MJR 3. For the reasons discussed herein, LVB’s motion is GRANTED as
13
discussed herein.
14
DISCUSSION
15
Bingham Defendants, Bingo, CCRB, and SKBB
16
LVB complains that the Bingham Defendants, Bingo, CCRB, and SKBB failed to
17
complete their responses and production and to certify their production by the Court-ordered
18
deadline of January 14, 2019. Dkt. 211 ¶¶ 1-5. At 11:52 pm on January 14, 2019, Mr.
19
Jacobowitz, counsel for Defendants, sent the following email:
20
21
22
23
As you know, the Court’s order required a very swift response. I regret to say that,
despite round-the-clock work, we have not yet finished all supplemental
responses and production. However, as a strong beginning, attached are the
supplemental interrogatory responses of David Bingham and Christopher
Bingham, with verification pages as ordered, and attachments. The majority of my
clients’ supplemental document production will follow shortly by dropbox. We
are making good progress on the rest of the responses and production and expect
to be done this week.
1
2
3
The attorneys have discussed, but not finalized a form of, a protective order for
confidential information. For now, I will trust in your and your clients’ good faith
as to bank account numbers and the like, and ask that you treat all bank records or
tax records, or other documents containing personal identifying information, as
confidential, and redact any such information before filing or other disclosure.
4
Dkt. 225, Ex. A. It is not known whether “the rest of the responses and production” were
5
completed and produced to LVB last week as promised by Mr. Jacobowitz. To the extent
6
Defendants have not done so, they must do so immediately.
7
On January 16, 17, and 21, 2019, Defendants submitted Certifications of Compliance:
8
Dkt. 219 (HTP); Dkt. 220 (Park Place); Dkt. 223 (Trustee); Dkt. 231 (David S. Bingham); Dkt.
9
232 (Christopher G. Bingham); Dkt. 233 (Sharon G. Bingham); Dkt. 234 (CCRB); Dkt. 235
10
(SSKB); Dkt. 235 (Kelly Bingham); and Dkt. 211 (Bingo). Defendants were advised that in
11
“producing the information and documents pursuant to this Order, all Defendants shall conduct a
12
reasonable search of all documents in your possession, custody, or control, including all email
13
accounts.” Dkt. 211 at 14. The Bingham Defendants, CCRB, SSKB, and Bingo limited their
14
production to documents found in email accounts with the search terms “LVB” and “trust”. See
15
Dkts. 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, and 240. Defendants’ narrowing of their searches to these
16
two terms is not reasonable. Defendants were ordered to “complete production of all non17
privileged documents” (Dkt. 211, ¶ 2) and therefore, all additional responsive, non-privilege
18
emails should be produced immediately.
19
Henry Dean, Trustee of Sharon Graham Bingham 2007 Trust
20
Trustee Henry Dean certified that a privilege log could not feasibly be completed by the
21
Court’s deadline. See Dkt. 223. On January 14, 2019 at 6:41 p.m., Ms. Zielinski of Williams
22
Kastner wrote an email to counsel for LVB stating: “[w]e are continuing to prepare the privilege
23
log.” Dkt. 225, p. 3, Ex. B. Again, it is not known whether the privilege log has yet been
1
completed or produced to LVB.
2
HyTech
3
Defendant HyTech only produced emails from only the email account of one person, its
4
finance specialist, Jason Jennings. In his certification, Mr. Jennings explains that while Henry
5
Dean is no longer an employee of the company, HyTech has preserved his email account in its
6
records. Dkt. 219, ¶ 1. HyTech should search Mr. Dean’s email account at HyTech, produce all
7
responsive, non-privileged emails from that account and any other account that may include
8
responsive emails, and certify under penalty of perjury: (i) that the email account was searched
9
(that the account has been preserved) and each step taken to conduct such search; (ii) the date
10
range of such search; and (iii) that all responsive communications and documents in HyTech’s or
11
Mr. Dean’s possession, custody, and control have been produced.
12
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
13
1.
Defendants are to comply in full with the Court’s January 9th Order (Dkt. 211)
immediately and in any event, no later than Monday, January 28, 2019 by close
of business.
2.
LVB is entitled to its additional, reasonable costs attorneys’ fees for bringing this
motion (in addition to the fees this Court has already permitted LVB to seek for
the initial motion to Compel) (Dkt. 211, ¶ 12);
3.
LVB’s expert may have an additional twenty-one (21) days from the date each
Defendant has certified full compliance with this Court’s January 9th Order (Dkt.
211) to amend her expert report to account for the untimely discovery;
4.
The deadline for LVB to produce its expert for deposition shall be fourteen (14)
days following service of the amended report.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DATED this 22nd day of January, 2019.
21
22
23
A
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?