LVB-Ogden Marketing LLC v. Bingham et al

Filing 242

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 225 Motion for Order Requiring Compliance with Court's January 9, 2019 Discovery Order, Dkt. 211 . Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (SWT)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

4
5
6

LVB-OGDEN MARKETING, LLC,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

v.
DAVID S. BINGHAM, SHARON
BINGHAM, CHRISTOPHER BINGHAM,
CHERISH BINGHAM, KELLY
BINGHAM, BINGO INVESTMENTS,
LLC, CCRB ENTERPRISES, LLC, SKBB
ENTERPRISES, LLC, PARK PLACE
MOTORS, LTD., HYTECH POWER, INC.,
HENRY DEAN, in his individual capacity
and as Trustee for the SHARON GRAHAM
BINGHAM 2007 TRUST, and BGH
HOLDINGS, LLC,

CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00243-TSZ
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ORDER
REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH
DKT. 211

Defendants.
On January 9, 2019, the undersigned granted the motion to compel (Dkt. 178) of Plaintiff

17

LVB-Ogden Marketing, LLC (“LVB”) Dkt. 211. Pursuant to the Court’s Order, Defendants

18

David S. Bingham, Sharon Bingham, Christopher Bingham, Cherish Bingham, Kelly Bingham

19

(the “Bingham Defendants”), Bingo Investments, LLC (“Bingo”), CCRB Enterprises, LLC

20

(“CCRB”), SSKB Enterprises, LLC (“SSKB”), Park Place Motors, Ltd. (“Park Place”), Hytech

21

Power, Inc. (“HTP” or “HyTech”), and Henry Dean, as Trustee for the Sharon Graham Bingham

22

2007 Trust (“the Trustee”) were ordered, inter alia, to produce by January 14, 2019, complete

23

answers to specified interrogatories and produce all non-privileged documents within their
possession, custody, or control. The Trustee was required to submit a privilege log for any

1

documents withheld on the basis of privilege. Id., ¶ 8. Defendants were also ordered to certify

2

under penalty of perjury: (i) which email accounts were searched (and that those accounts have

3

been preserved) and each step taken to conduct such search; (ii) the date range of such search;

4

and (iii) that all responsive communications and documents in their possession, custody, and

5

control have been produced. Id., ¶ 11.

6

On January 15, 2019, LVB filed an ex parte motion for an order (1) compelling

7

Defendants to comply immediately with the Court’s January 9, 2019 discovery order; (2)

8

permitting LVB to seek additional costs and attorneys’ fees for having to bring the motion; and,

9

(3) extending the expert discovery period so that LVB’s expert can supplement her report to

10

account for the untimely discovery. Dkt. 225, p. 2. This motion was referred to the undersigned

11

by the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)A) and Local Magistrate

12

Judge’s Rule MJR 3. For the reasons discussed herein, LVB’s motion is GRANTED as

13

discussed herein.

14

DISCUSSION

15

Bingham Defendants, Bingo, CCRB, and SKBB

16

LVB complains that the Bingham Defendants, Bingo, CCRB, and SKBB failed to

17

complete their responses and production and to certify their production by the Court-ordered

18

deadline of January 14, 2019. Dkt. 211 ¶¶ 1-5. At 11:52 pm on January 14, 2019, Mr.

19

Jacobowitz, counsel for Defendants, sent the following email:

20
21
22
23

As you know, the Court’s order required a very swift response. I regret to say that,
despite round-the-clock work, we have not yet finished all supplemental
responses and production. However, as a strong beginning, attached are the
supplemental interrogatory responses of David Bingham and Christopher
Bingham, with verification pages as ordered, and attachments. The majority of my
clients’ supplemental document production will follow shortly by dropbox. We
are making good progress on the rest of the responses and production and expect
to be done this week.

1
2
3

The attorneys have discussed, but not finalized a form of, a protective order for
confidential information. For now, I will trust in your and your clients’ good faith
as to bank account numbers and the like, and ask that you treat all bank records or
tax records, or other documents containing personal identifying information, as
confidential, and redact any such information before filing or other disclosure.

4
Dkt. 225, Ex. A. It is not known whether “the rest of the responses and production” were
5
completed and produced to LVB last week as promised by Mr. Jacobowitz. To the extent
6
Defendants have not done so, they must do so immediately.
7
On January 16, 17, and 21, 2019, Defendants submitted Certifications of Compliance:
8
Dkt. 219 (HTP); Dkt. 220 (Park Place); Dkt. 223 (Trustee); Dkt. 231 (David S. Bingham); Dkt.
9
232 (Christopher G. Bingham); Dkt. 233 (Sharon G. Bingham); Dkt. 234 (CCRB); Dkt. 235
10
(SSKB); Dkt. 235 (Kelly Bingham); and Dkt. 211 (Bingo). Defendants were advised that in
11
“producing the information and documents pursuant to this Order, all Defendants shall conduct a
12
reasonable search of all documents in your possession, custody, or control, including all email
13
accounts.” Dkt. 211 at 14. The Bingham Defendants, CCRB, SSKB, and Bingo limited their
14
production to documents found in email accounts with the search terms “LVB” and “trust”. See
15
Dkts. 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, and 240. Defendants’ narrowing of their searches to these
16
two terms is not reasonable. Defendants were ordered to “complete production of all non17
privileged documents” (Dkt. 211, ¶ 2) and therefore, all additional responsive, non-privilege
18
emails should be produced immediately.
19
Henry Dean, Trustee of Sharon Graham Bingham 2007 Trust
20
Trustee Henry Dean certified that a privilege log could not feasibly be completed by the
21
Court’s deadline. See Dkt. 223. On January 14, 2019 at 6:41 p.m., Ms. Zielinski of Williams
22
Kastner wrote an email to counsel for LVB stating: “[w]e are continuing to prepare the privilege
23
log.” Dkt. 225, p. 3, Ex. B. Again, it is not known whether the privilege log has yet been

1

completed or produced to LVB.

2

HyTech

3

Defendant HyTech only produced emails from only the email account of one person, its

4

finance specialist, Jason Jennings. In his certification, Mr. Jennings explains that while Henry

5

Dean is no longer an employee of the company, HyTech has preserved his email account in its

6

records. Dkt. 219, ¶ 1. HyTech should search Mr. Dean’s email account at HyTech, produce all

7

responsive, non-privileged emails from that account and any other account that may include

8

responsive emails, and certify under penalty of perjury: (i) that the email account was searched

9

(that the account has been preserved) and each step taken to conduct such search; (ii) the date

10

range of such search; and (iii) that all responsive communications and documents in HyTech’s or

11

Mr. Dean’s possession, custody, and control have been produced.

12

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

13

1.

Defendants are to comply in full with the Court’s January 9th Order (Dkt. 211)
immediately and in any event, no later than Monday, January 28, 2019 by close
of business.

2.

LVB is entitled to its additional, reasonable costs attorneys’ fees for bringing this
motion (in addition to the fees this Court has already permitted LVB to seek for
the initial motion to Compel) (Dkt. 211, ¶ 12);

3.

LVB’s expert may have an additional twenty-one (21) days from the date each
Defendant has certified full compliance with this Court’s January 9th Order (Dkt.
211) to amend her expert report to account for the untimely discovery;

4.

The deadline for LVB to produce its expert for deposition shall be fourteen (14)
days following service of the amended report.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

DATED this 22nd day of January, 2019.
21
22
23

A

BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA
Chief United States Magistrate Judge