Borreggine v. ProKarma Inc et al

Filing 24

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages authorized by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

4
5
6

PETER BORREGGINE,

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. C18-0336 RSM
MINUTE ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR OVERLENGTH BRIEF AS MOOT

v.
PROKARMA, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge:
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Overlength Reply
Brief. Dkt. #22. Plaintiff apparently believes he is entitled to only six pages in opposition to

17

Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss, and therefore seeks additional pages, and asks the

18

Court to accept the “overlength brief” he has already filed. Id.

19

Under the Court’s Local Civil Rules, when responding to a motion to dismiss, “briefs

20

in opposition shall not exceed twenty-four pages. Reply briefs shall not exceed twelve pages.”

21
22
23
24
25
26

Local Civil Rule 7(e)(3). The opposition that Plaintiff has filed is only nine pages. See Dkt.
#21. Accordingly, it is not overlength, and the Court will accept it as filed. As a result,
Plaintiff’s motion for overlength brief (Dkt. #22) is DENIED AS MOOT.
The Court’s Local Rules are available on the Court’s public internet site. Plaintiff is
encouraged to access and review those Rules.
MINUTE ORDER - 1

1

DATED this 20th day of June, 2018.

2

WILLIAM McCOOL, Clerk

3

By:

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
MINUTE ORDER - 2

/s/ Paula McNabb
Deputy Clerk