Emmanuel et al v. King County et al

Filing 9

ORDER directing Plaintiffs to file the corrected complaint 2 as an amended complaint no later than Wednesday, March 21, 2018, at 12:00 p.m. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

8
9
10

KEITH EMMANUEL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

11

CASE NO. C18-0377JLR
ORDER

v.
12
13

KING COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

On March 14, 2018, the court ordered Plaintiffs Keith Emmanuel, Richard

16

Homchick, and Charles Peter (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) to show cause why the court

17

should not treat their “corrected” complaint as an amended complaint. (See 3/14/18

18

Order (Dkt. # 3)); Corr. Compl. (Dkt. # 2).) Plaintiffs and Defendants King County, John

19

Urquhart, and Daniel Satterberg filed responses in which they agree that the court should

20

treat Plaintiffs’ “corrected” complaint as an amended complaint. (See Pls. Resp. (Dkt.

21

# 6); Defs. Resp. (Dkt. # 7).) Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file the

22

“corrected” complaint as an amended complaint no later than Wednesday, March 21,

ORDER - 1

1

2018, at 12:00 p.m. (See Pls. Resp. at 3 (agreeing that Plaintiffs should “re-file the

2

‘corrected’ document as an amended complaint” (internal citation omitted)).) Plaintiffs’

3

amended complaint may not differ from the “corrected” complaint.

4

Dated this 20th day of March, 2018.

5
6

A

7

JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER - 2