Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A. et al v. Itec, LLC et al

Filing 10

ORDER re: 9 Stipulated Motion Extending Initial Scheduling Dates. FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 6/29/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/6/2018, Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan due by 7/13/2018. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 11 HYPERION ENTERTAINMENT C.V.B.A., No. C18-0381 RSM 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, vs. ITEC, LLC, a New York limited liability company; AMIGA, INC., a Delaware corporation; AMINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; and CLOANTO CORPORATION, a Nevada Corporation STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER EXTENDING INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER EXTENDING INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES CASE No. 2:18-cv-00381 LEE & HAYES, PLLC 701 Pike Street, Ste. 1600 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 315-4001 Fax: (509) 323-8979 1 2 3 4 5 6 Plaintiff Hyperion Entertainment C.V.B.A. (“Hyperion”), together with Defendant Cloanto Corporation (“Cloanto”), pursuant to LCR 7(d)(1) and LCR 10(g), jointly move the Court for its Order extending, by approximately two months, the Initial Scheduling Dates in the Court’s Order (Doc. 6) Regarding Initial Disclosures etc. Proposed new dates are set forth below. Hyperion and Cloanto jointly advise the Court that to date, they are the only parties to have 7 appeared in this action. None of the Defendants have yet been served, though Plaintiff has 8 requested that every Defendant waive service as provided by FRCP 4(d). Hyperion and Cloanto 9 10 11 12 13 advise the Court of their understanding that all Defendants are considering waiver of service and intend to propose a common deadline for all Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Hyperion’s Amended Complaint. Hyperion and Cloanto also advise the Court that they have met and conferred as provided 14 by LCR 42(b) regarding consolidation of this action with Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-00535-JLR, 15 Cloanto Corporation v. Hyperion C.V.B.A., transferred to this District from the Northern District 16 17 18 19 20 21 of New York by order dated April 11, 2018. Plaintiff has proposed consolidation to counsel who may appear for the remaining Defendants. Extension of case deadlines in this matter will facilitate further conference about consolidation with those Defendants who have not yet appeared. Thus, for the reasons set forth above, Hyperion and Cloanto move that the Court extend the Initial Scheduling Dates in this matter as follows: 22 23 24 25 26 Deadline for FRCP 26(f) Conference: 6/29/2018 Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) 7/6/2018 Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as Required by FRCP 26(f) And Local Civil Rule 26(f) 7/13/2018 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER EXTENDING INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES - 1 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381 LEE & HAYES, PLLC 701 Pike Street, Ste. 1600 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 315-4001 Fax: (509) 323-8979 1 Respectfully submitted this 26th day of April, 2018. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 By: s/ Robert J. Carlson Robert J. Carlson, WSBA 18455 Rhett V. Barney, WSBA 44764 Sarah E. Elsden, WSBA 51158 Lee & Hayes, PLLC 701 Pike Street, Ste. 1600 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 315-4001 Fax: (509) 323-8979 Email: Bob@leehayes.com Email: RhettB@leehayes.com Sarah.Elsden@leehayes.com Attorneys for Plaintiff By: s/ Michael G. Atkins Michael G. Atkins, WSBA 26026 Atkins Intellectual Property, PLLC 113 Cherry Street #18483 Seattle, WA 98104-2205 Telephone: (206) 628-0983 Email: mike@atkinsip.com Attorneys for Defendant Cloanto Corporation 19 20 21 22 23 SO ORDERED this 27th day of April 2018. A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER EXTENDING INITIAL SCHEDULING DATES - 2 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00381 LEE & HAYES, PLLC 701 Pike Street, Ste. 1600 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 315-4001 Fax: (509) 323-8979

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?