Jantos v. DirecTV et al
Filing
34
MINUTE ORDER striking without prejudice to refiling defendant Qwest Corporation's 21 Motion to Dismiss, and defendants DirectTV and DirecTV LLC's 22 Motion to Compel Arbitration; striking deadlines for FRCP 26(f) conference, initial disclosures and Joint Status Report. Any motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement due on or before 10/11/2018. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
JAMES JANTOS, individually and on
behalf of similarly situated individuals,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
12
C18-413 TSZ
v.
DIRECTV; DIRECTV, LLC; and
QWEST CORP. dba CENTURYLINK
QC,
MINUTE ORDER
Defendants.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable
Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:
(1)
Counsel having telephonically advised the Court that this matter has settled
in principle, and pursuant to the agreement of all parties, the Court ORDERS as follows:
(a)
Defendant Qwest Corporation’s motion to dismiss, docket no. 21,
and defendants DIRECTV’s and DIRECTV, LLC’s motion to compel arbitration
or alternatively dismiss for lack of standing, docket no. 22, are STRICKEN
without prejudice to refiling in the event that the parties are unable to perfect their
settlement;
20
(b)
The deadlines for conducting a Rule 26(f) conference, exchanging
initial disclosures, and filing a Joint Status Report are STRICKEN; and
21
(c)
Any motion for preliminary approval of a class action settlement
shall be filed on or before October 11, 2018.
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
1
(2)
record.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of
2
Dated this 14th day of August, 2018.
3
William M. McCool
Clerk
4
5
s/Karen Dews
Deputy Clerk
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?