Brennan v. Estrada
Filing
27
ORDER adopting the 26 Report and Recommendation; granting Defendant's 12 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing Plaintiff's complaint and this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), for failure of plaintiff to state any cla im upon which relief may be granted; denying Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. 15 ), his request forpreliminary injunctive relief (Dkts. 16 , [17)], and his motion for sanctions (Dkt. 18 ). Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
RONALD JOHN BRENNAN, JR.,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
Case No. C18-417-RSM
v.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
DEPUTY ESTRADA,
Defendant.
13
14
15
The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, defendant’s motion to dismiss this
16
action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Report and
17
Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, any
18
objections thereto, and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS:
19
(1)
The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted.
20
(2)
Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 12) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s complaint
21
(Dkt. 5) and this action are DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), for
22
failure of plaintiff to state any claim upon which relief may be granted.
23
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS - 1
1
2
3
4
5
(3)
Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. 15), his request for
preliminary injunctive relief (Dkts. 16, 17), and his motion for sanctions (Dkt. 18) are DENIED.
(4)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for
defendant, and to the Honorable James P. Donohue.
DATED this 12th day of September 2018.
6
A
7
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?