Suber v. Snohomish County Corrections Mailroom Staff et al
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL AND TERMINATING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. The Court DIRECTS the clerk to TERMINATE: C/O Munsens; C/O Young; C/O Louis and Snohomish County Corrections. Service by 1st Class Mail to Snohomish County Corrections Mail Room Staff on 4/24/2018, CC: Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney. (AE)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
JAMES SUBER,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
CASE NO. 18-428 RAJ-BAT
v.
9
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY
FIRST-CLASS MAIL AND
TERMINATING CERTAIN
DEFENDANTS
SNOHOMISH COUNTY CORRECTIONS
MAIL ROOM STAFF,
Plaintiff proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this federal civil rights action filed
14
an amended complaint. Dkt. 7. The Amended complaint names as Defendants Snohomish
15
County Corrections and the Snohomish County Corrections Mail Room Staff. It alleges that on
16
January 17, 2018, legal mail sent to Mr. Suber, by his attorney, Casey Trueblood, was opened
17
my jail mailroom staff outside the presence of plaintiff.
18
19
20
21
22
23
In light of the allegations in the Amended Complaint, the Court DIRECTS the clerk to
TERMINATE from the docket the following defendants:
(1)
C/O Munsens; C/O Young and C/O Louis who are described as witnesses in
the amended complaint, not defendants; and
(2)
Snohomish County Corrections. The Snohomish County Corrections is not an
entity which may be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Moreover, the amended complaint indicates
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY FIRSTCLASS MAIL AND TERMINATING
CERTAIN DEFENDANTS - 1
1
Snohomish County Corrections did not implement a rule or policy regarding the mail that
2
violated plaintiff’s rights. To the contrary, the amended complaint alleges that the Mail Room
3
Staff “violated the mail policy on corrections,” i.e. violated a rule of Snohomish Corrections.
4
Dkt. 7 at 3.
5
The Court further ORDERS as follows:
6
(1)
7
The Clerk is directed to send the following to defendants Snohomish County Mail Room
Service by Clerk
8
Staff by first class mail: a copy of plaintiff’s complaint and of this Order, two copies of the
9
Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, a Waiver of Service of
10
11
12
Summons, and a return envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to the Clerk’s office.
The Clerk shall also send a courtesy copy of the complaint and of this Order to
Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney, by first-class mail.
13
(2)
Response Required
14
Defendants shall have 30 days within which to return the enclosed waiver of service of
15
summons. Any defendant who timely returns the signed waiver shall have 60 days after the date
16
designated on the notice of lawsuit to file and serve an answer to the complaint or a motion
17
permitted under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
18
Any defendant who fails to timely return the signed waiver will be personally served with
19
a summons and complaint, and may be required to pay the full costs of such service, pursuant to
20
Rule 4(d)(2). A defendant who has been personally served shall file an answer or motion
21
permitted under Rule 12 within 30 days after service.
22
23
Defendants MUST serve a Rand notice concurrently with motions to dismiss based
on a failure to exhaust and motions for summary judgment so that pro se prisoner plaintiffs
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY FIRSTCLASS MAIL AND TERMINATING
CERTAIN DEFENDANTS - 2
1
will have fair, timely and adequate notice of what is required of them in order to oppose
2
those motions. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012). The Ninth Circuit set forth
3
model language for such notices:
4
A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case.
5
Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for
summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be
granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if
there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result
of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled
to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a
party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is
properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you
cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you
must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers
to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in
Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant’s
declarations and documents and show that there is a genuine
issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own
evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate,
may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted,
your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (emphasis added).
15
Defendants who do not file and serve, in a separate document, the required Rand
16
notice will face (a) immediate denial of their motions with leave to refile and (b) possible
17
monetary sanctions.
18
(3)
Filing and Service by Parties Generally
19
All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents
20
electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. All non-attorneys, such as pro se parties and/or
21
prisoners, may continue to file a paper original with the Clerk. All filings, whether filed
22
electronically or in traditional paper format, must indicate in the upper right hand corner the
23
name of the Magistrate Judge to whom the document is directed.
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY FIRSTCLASS MAIL AND TERMINATING
CERTAIN DEFENDANTS - 3
1
When an electronic filing exceeds 50 pages in length, a paper copy of the document (with
2
tabs or other organizing aids as necessary) shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office for chambers.
3
The chambers copy must be clearly marked with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing
4
for Chambers.” A party filing a paper original does not need to file a chambers copy.
5
6
Additionally, any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it
has been served upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in this case.
7
(4)
8
Regarding the filing of motions before the Court, the parties are directed to review Local
9
Motions
Rule CR 7 in its entirety. A few important points are highlighted below:
10
Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served.
11
Pursuant to Local Rule CR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be
12
submitted as a part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall
13
include in its caption (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date
14
the motion is to be noted for consideration upon the court’s motion calendar.
15
In all instances where one of the parties to a lawsuit is incarcerated, all categories of
16
non-dispositive motions not listed in Local Rule CR 7(d)(1) must be noted for the third
17
Friday after the date of filing and service. See Local Rule CR 7(d)(2).
18
19
All dispositive motions shall be noted for consideration no earlier than the fourth Friday
following filing and service of the motion.
20
(5)
21
No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with
22
23
Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge
regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk.
(6)
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff.
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY FIRSTCLASS MAIL AND TERMINATING
CERTAIN DEFENDANTS - 4
1
DATED this 24th day of April, 2018.
2
3
A
4
BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY FIRSTCLASS MAIL AND TERMINATING
CERTAIN DEFENDANTS - 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?