Providence Health & Services et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
Filing
63
ORDER striking the Court's 62 Judgment in a Civil Case. The Court's Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 61 ) remains untouched. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
PROVIDENCE HEALTH AND SERVICES,
a Washington non-profit corporation; and
SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES, a
Washington non-profit corporation,
Case No. C18-495 RSM
ORDER STRIKING JUDGMENT POSTED
IN ERROR
Plaintiffs,
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S
LONDON, SYNDICATE 2623/623
(BEAZLEY); and FEDERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On January 16, 2019, the Court issued
an Order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and denying Defendants’
22
Motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. #61. At the same time, the Court issued a Judgment in a
23
Civil Case accurately setting forth the decision by the Court. Dkt. #62. Typically, the Court
24
25
26
would not issue a judgment after ruling on partial summary judgment. This judgment was
posted in error, could lead to confusion, and will be stricken. The Court will reserve issuing a
27
judgment in this case until claims are granted or dismissed on summary judgment or at trial,
28
unless the parties move for a judgment to be entered.
ORDER STRIKING JUDGMENT POSTED IN ERROR - 1
1
Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS that the Court’s January 16, 2019,
2
Judgment in a Civil Case (Dkt. #62) is STRICKEN. The Court’s Order granting Plaintiffs’
3
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. #61) remains untouched.
4
DATED this 17th day of January 2019.
5
6
7
8
A
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER STRIKING JUDGMENT POSTED IN ERROR - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?