Providence Health & Services et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al

Filing 63

ORDER striking the Court's 62 Judgment in a Civil Case. The Court's Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. # 61 ) remains untouched. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

Download PDF
  1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PROVIDENCE HEALTH AND SERVICES, a Washington non-profit corporation; and SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES, a Washington non-profit corporation, Case No. C18-495 RSM ORDER STRIKING JUDGMENT POSTED IN ERROR Plaintiffs, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, SYNDICATE 2623/623 (BEAZLEY); and FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On January 16, 2019, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and denying Defendants’ 22 Motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. #61. At the same time, the Court issued a Judgment in a 23 Civil Case accurately setting forth the decision by the Court. Dkt. #62. Typically, the Court 24 25 26 would not issue a judgment after ruling on partial summary judgment. This judgment was posted in error, could lead to confusion, and will be stricken. The Court will reserve issuing a 27 judgment in this case until claims are granted or dismissed on summary judgment or at trial, 28 unless the parties move for a judgment to be entered. ORDER STRIKING JUDGMENT POSTED IN ERROR - 1   1 Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS that the Court’s January 16, 2019, 2 Judgment in a Civil Case (Dkt. #62) is STRICKEN. The Court’s Order granting Plaintiffs’ 3 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. #61) remains untouched. 4 DATED this 17th day of January 2019. 5 6 7 8 A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER STRIKING JUDGMENT POSTED IN ERROR - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?