Burleson v. Security Properties Residential, LLC et al

Filing 157

ORDER REGARDINGSETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re Parties' 156 Joint Motion for Clarification: As specified in the second amended case management order: The settlement conference conducted between the close of discovery and the filing of dispositive motions requires a face-to-face meeting or a telephone conference between persons with authority to settle the case. The settlement conference does not have to involve a third-party neutral. The Court declines to appoint a judicial officer as a neutral at this point in the proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

5
6
7

SHARON ELAINE BURLESON,

8

CASE NO. C18-0513RSL

Plaintiff,

9

v.

ORDER REGARDING
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

10
11

SECURITY PROPERTIES
RESIDENTIAL, LLC, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendants’ Joint Motion for
Clarification.” Dkt. # 156. As specified in the second amended case management order:
The settlement conference conducted between the close of discovery and
the filing of dispositive motions requires a face-to-face meeting or a
telephone conference between persons with authority to settle the case.
The settlement conference does not have to involve a third-party neutral.
The Court declines to appoint a judicial officer as a neutral at this point in the
proceedings.

21
22
23
24

Dated this 12th day of January, 2021.
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge

25
26

ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE