Delashaw v. Seattle Times Company et al
Filing
41
ORDER denying the parties' #40 stipulated motion for entry of their agreed protective order. The motion is denied without prejudice to re-filing in a manner that comports with the court's local rules. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
JOHNNY B. DELASHAW, JR.,
Plaintiff,
11
CASE NO. C18-0537JLR
ORDER
v.
12
13
SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY,
Defendant.
14
15
Before the court is the parties’ proposed stipulated protective order. The parties
16
have asked the court to enter this stipulation as an order of the court. (See Stip. (Dkt.
17
# 40).) The parties, however, have failed to comply with Local Rule 26(c)(2). See Local
18
Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 26(c)(2). Pursuant to this rule, “[p]arties are encouraged to use
19
this district’s model protective order, available on the court’s website.” Id. “Parties that
20
wish to depart from the model order must provide the court with a redlined version
21
identifying departures from the model.” Id. The parties’ proposed stipulated protective
22
order departs significantly from the court’s model order, but the parties have failed to
ORDER - 1
1
provide a red-lined version as required under the local rules. Accordingly, the court
2
DENIES the parties’ stipulated motion for entry of their agreed protective order (Dkt.
3
# 40), but without prejudice to re-filing in a manner that comports with the court’s local
4
rules.
5
Dated this 31st day of August, 2018.
7
A
8
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?