California Expanded Metal Products Company et al v. James Klein et al

Filing 252

REPORT and Recommendation Re: Plaintiffs' Motion to File Over-Length Briefs Pursuant to LCR 7(F) and Stipulated Motion to Bifurcate Damages by Special Master Mark Walters. Noted by Clerk for 9/7/2021 (Yanick, Miles). Modified to turn into R&R and noted for same-day, per chambers on 9/8/2021 (LH).

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00659-JLR Document 252 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 4 THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART SPECIAL MASTER MARK P. WALTERS 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, a California corporation; and CLARKWESTERN DIETRICH BUILDING SYSTEMS LLC, dba CLARKDIETRICH BUILDING SYSTEMS, an Ohio limited liability company, v. Plaintiffs, JAMES A. KLEIN, an individual; BLAZEFRAME INDUSTRIES, LTD., a Washington company; and SAFTI-SEAL, INC., a Washington company, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 18-cv-00659-JLR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE OVER-LENGTH BRIEFS PURSUANT TO LCR 7(F) AND STIPULATED MOTION TO BIFURCATE DAMAGES 17 18 This matter comes before the Special Master on the following: 19 (1) Plaintiffs California Expanded Metal Products Company (“CEMCO”) and 20 Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC’s, d.b.a. ClarkDietrich Building Systems’ 21 22 23 24 25 26 (“ClarkDietrich”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion to File Over-Length Briefs Pursuant to LCR 7(f) Re: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Contempt, and (2) a stipulated motion to bifurcate issues related to damages that may be awarded should the Court find any party in contempt. The Special Master, having considered the the Motion to File Overlength Brief, and Report And Recommendation - 1 CASE NO. 18-cv-00659 Case 2:18-cv-00659-JLR Document 252 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4 pursuant to LCR 7(f), recommends that the Court grant the motion as follows. Brief Plaintiffs’ Opening Brief Defendants and Third Party’s Opposition Brief Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief Page Limit 50 50 20 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 The Special Master, having considered the stipulated motion to bifurcate issues related to damages, recommends as follows. “[D]istrict courts, in their discretion, may bifurcate willfulness and damages issues from liability issues in any given case,” and they have “the authority to try these issues together or separately just as they have the authority to try all issues together at the liability stage.” Robert Bosch, LLC v. Pylon Mfg. Corp., 719 F.3d 1305, 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2013). 13 During the hearing held on June 25, 2021, for arguments on Plaintiffs’ motion to add non- 14 parties to these contempt proceedings, the parties discussed the status of discovery related 15 to damages, should non-parties be added to the contempt proceedings. (Hearing Transcript 16 17 18 19 20 at 63:1-63:21.) During that hearing, it was mentioned that some discovery on the issue had been provided, but that because non-parties were not a part of the contempt proceedings at that time, that damages discovery from them had not been fully explored. The parties and S4S, who has now been added to these contempt proceedings, 21 submitted a stipulation to the Special Master on September 3, 2021, agreeing that “[t]he 22 contempt motion [currently due September 8, 2021, Dkt. #238] will not address any claim 23 of damages as supplementation of discovery related to damages will be required” and that 24 25 26 “in the event that the Court finds contempt and permits damages, the Parties jointly request a schedule setting forth the deadlines for supplementation of written discovery on damages, Report And Recommendation - 2 CASE NO. 18-cv-00659 Case 2:18-cv-00659-JLR Document 252 Filed 09/07/21 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 Plaintiffs’ motion for damages, Defendants’ opposition, and Plaintiffs’ reply thereto.” In view of the discretion provided to district courts by the Federal Circuit to hear issues related to damages separately from liability issues, Robert Bosch, 719 F.3d at 1319, which the Special Master believes to be coextensive with the discretion to hear those issues separately in contempt proceedings, and given the statements by the parties to these 7 contempt proceedings relating to status of discovery as of June 25, 2021 (i.e., that open 8 issues remained relating to damages discovery from non-parties, including S4S), and the 9 stipulation submitted on September 3, 2021, the Special Master recommends that the Court 10 grant the stipulated motion to bifurcate damages from liability during these contempt 11 12 13 14 proceedings. It is recommended further that, should contempt be found, the parties to these contempt proceedings shall be ordered to meet and confer within seven (7) days of any such 15 order and submit a joint status report setting forth the discovery sought on damages and a 16 proposed schedule within (14) days of any such order. If agreement on the proposed 17 schedule or discovery sought cannot be reached, the parties must clearly set forth any areas 18 of disagreement in the joint-report. 19 20 21 Dated this 7TH day of September, 2021 22 23 ____________________________ Mark P. Walters Special Master 24 25 26 Report And Recommendation - 3 CASE NO. 18-cv-00659 Case 2:18-cv-00659-JLR Document 252 Filed 09/07/21 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I certify that on August 7, 2021, a copy of this pleading was filed electronically with the 3 Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all 4 5 counsel of record via email. /s/Rischel Voigt Rischel Voigt, Paralegal 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Report And Recommendation - 4 CASE NO. 18-cv-00659

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?