Mayes v. Ohashi et al

Filing 27

ORDER denying parties' 26 Stipulated Motion to Amend Minute Order Setting Trial Date. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.(MW)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8

MARK MAYES,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11
12

v.

CASE NO. C18-696RSM
ORDER DENYING STIPULATED
MOTION

ALEXANDER OHASHI and ACE
PARKING,
Defendants.

13
14
15

This matter is before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion (Dkt. #26) seeking to

16

modify the Court’s May 7, 2019 Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates (Dkt. #25). The

17

scheduling order followed the Parties’ May 3, 2019 Joint Status Report in which they proposed

18
19

a trial date of June 15, 2020 and did not indicate any scheduling conflicts beyond May 11, 2020.
Dkt. #23 at 6. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) provides that scheduling orders “may be

20
21
22

modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” The Parties provide no basis for
their request, providing only: “The Parties have conferred and stipulate as to the currently set

23

trial date for July 13, 2020 to September 21, 2020.” Dkt. #26.

24

//

25

//

26

ORDER – 1

1

Having reviewed the Parties’ motion and the remainder of the record, the Court does not

2

find good cause to modify its scheduling order and ORDERS that the Parties’ Stipulated Motion

3

(Dkt. #26) is DENIED.

4

Dated this 13 day of May, 2019.

5

A

6
7

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER – 2