United States of America v. Engen et al
Filing
63
ORDER granting the Parties' 62 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LH)
Case 2:18-cv-00712-RSM Document 63 Filed 07/20/20 Page 1 of 4
The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROL L. ENGEN, KING COUNTY, and
)
QUALSTAR CREDIT UNION,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)
Case No. 2:18-cv-00712-RSM
STIPULATION REGARDING
PRIORITY
The United States of America (“United States”) and King County, by and through their
respective undersigned counsel, agree and stipulate as follows:
1.
On May 16, 2018, the United States commenced this action, seeking, inter alia, to
reduce federal tax assessments against Carol L. Engen to judgment, and foreclose federal tax
liens on real property located in King County (“Subject Property”). Dkt. No. 1.
2.
The Subject Property is commonly referred to as 16423 NE 15th Street, Bellevue,
24
WA 98008, bearing King County Assessor’s Parcel No. 329830-0450, and legally described as
25
follows:
26
27
LOT 26, BLOCK 2, HIGHLAND HILLS NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 62 OF PLATS, PAGE 74,
Stip. Re Priority
(Case No. 2:18-cv-00712-RSM)
1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Tax Division, Western Region
P.O. Box 683
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: 202-514-6056
Case 2:18-cv-00712-RSM Document 63 Filed 07/20/20 Page 2 of 4
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
See Dkt. No. 1, at ¶ 8.
3.
King County was named as a defendant in this matter pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §
7403(b) because it may have an interest in the Subject Property. Dkt. No. 1, at ¶ 6.
4.
King County’s interest in the Subject Property is for any unpaid real property
taxes, which are secured by liens that encumber the subject property pursuant to RCW
84.60.020.
5.
To the extent there is any unpaid amount owed to King County to which 26
10
U.S.C. § 6323(b)(6) applies, on the date of the sale of the Subject Property, such amount will be
11
pro-rated through the date of the sale confirmation, and will have priority over the United States’
12
federal tax liens and judgment lien against the Subject Property.
13
14
15
16
17
6.
In the event the Court orders the sale of the Subject Property, the Subject Property
will be sold free and clear of all the interests of the parties to this case. The proposed Order of
Foreclosure and Judicial Sale submitted by the United States shall provide that the sale proceeds
will be distributed first to the Internal Revenue Service to the extent of its costs and expenses of
18
the sale; second to King County to satisfy any amounts described in Paragraph 4, above; third to
19
the United States for federal tax liens; and fourth to the Clerk of the Court for any balance
20
remaining after the above payments until further order of the Court. If the affected parties cannot
21
22
stipulate to the amounts of their liens, the parties shall file written briefs setting forth their
positions and the Court shall determine the amounts of the liens.
23
24
25
7.
In the event King County initiates collection procedures for unpaid property taxes
against the Subject Property while this action is pending, including but not limited to, assignment
26
of the property tax liens, King County shall notify counsel for the United States, in writing, prior
27
to initiating such action.
Stip. Re Priority
(Case No. 2:18-cv-00712-RSM)
2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Tax Division, Western Region
P.O. Box 683
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: 202-514-6056
Case 2:18-cv-00712-RSM Document 63 Filed 07/20/20 Page 3 of 4
1
8.
The United States and King County agree to bear their own respective costs
2
related to this litigation, including any possible attorney’s fees, except costs of sale, which are
3
paid out of the sale proceeds, ahead of any other party, as detailed in Paragraph 6, above. In
4
addition, King County will be bound by the Court’s Order of Sale of the Subject Property, and
5
the United States will not seek any monetary judgment against King County.
6
7
DATED: July 17, 2020
RICHARD E. ZUCKERMAN
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
8
/s/ Rika Valdman
YEN JEANNETTE TRAN
RIKA VALDMAN
Trial Attorneys, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 683
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone:
202-616-3366 (Tran)
202-514-6056 (Valdman)
Fax: 202-307-0054
Email: Y.Jeannette.Tran@usdoj.gov
Rika.Valdman@usdoj.gov
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for the United States of America
16
17
18
19
/s/ Jennifer H. Atchison
JENNIFER H. ATCHISON
King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office (3rd
Ave.)
516 3rd Ave.
W400 King County Courthouse
Seattle, WA 98104
Telephone: 206-296-9000
Email: Jennifer.atchison@kingcounty.gov
Attorney for King County
DATED: July 17, 2020
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Stip. Re Priority
(Case No. 2:18-cv-00712-RSM)
3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Tax Division, Western Region
P.O. Box 683
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: 202-514-6056
Case 2:18-cv-00712-RSM Document 63 Filed 07/20/20 Page 4 of 4
ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
The foregoing Stipulation between the United States and King County is APPROVED.
SO ORDERED.
DATED this 20th day of July, 2020.
6
7
A
8
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 17th day of July, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing
with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notice of such filing to the
following CM/ECF participant(s):
Jennifer H. Atchison (jennifer.atchison@kingcounty.gov)
Attorney for King County
Carol L. Engen (washnative@comcast.net)
Pro Se Defendant
22
s/ Rika Valdman
RIKA VALDMAN
Trial Attorney, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
23
24
25
26
27
Stip. Re Priority
(Case No. 2:18-cv-00712-RSM)
4
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Tax Division, Western Region
P.O. Box 683
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: 202-514-6056
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?