Ogilvie v. Thrifty PayLess Inc

Filing 20

ORDER striking plaintiff's 19 Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff must file a stipulation indicating Thifty PayLess's written consent before filing her second amended complaint. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 MARJORIE OGILVIE, Plaintiff, 11 v. CASE NO. C18-0718JLR ORDER STRIKING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 13 THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC., Defendant. 14 15 On August 13, 2018, Plaintiff Marjorie Ogilvie filed a second amended complaint. 16 (SAC (Dkt. # 19).) Because the time has passed for amending her complaint as a matter 17 of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1), Ms. Ogilvie may amend her “pleading only with 18 the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Ms. 19 Ogilvie attaches to her second amended complaint an email in which Defendant Thrifty 20 PayLess, Inc.’s counsel consents to a filing. (See Email (Dkt. # 19-2) at 2.) That email is 21 insufficient, however, to establish Thrifty PayLess’s written consent under Rule 15(a)(2). 22 The court cannot discern that counsel consented specifically to the second amended ORDER - 1 1 complaint. (See id.) Accordingly, the court DIRECTS the Clerk to strike that filing (Dkt. 2 # 19). Ms. Ogilvie must file a stipulation indicating Thrifty PayLess’s written consent 3 before filing her second amended complaint. See Windermere Holdings, LLC v. U.S. 4 Wall Decor, LLC, No. C 10-03955 LB, 2011 WL 3419467, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 5 2011) (directing the plaintiff to supplement the record “to reflect the parties’ stipulation” 6 to an amended complaint). 7 Dated this 17th day of August, 2018. 8 9 A 10 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?