Clayton et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al

Filing 156

ORDER granting Defendant's 150 Motion for Limited Discovery on Cause of Death. The deadline to disclose expert testimony is extended to 12/16/2019, for the sole purpose of allowing the parties to disclose expert reports (or amendments to curr ent expert reports) on Mr. Clayton's cause of death. The deadline to complete discovery is extended to 1/31/2020, following limited purposes only. Motions related to this additional discovery must be filed by 1/10/2020. Motions challenging expert witness testimony on Mr. Claytons cause of death must befiled by 2/17/2020. Signed by Judge James L. Robart.(SWT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 WILLIAM R. CLAYTON and JILL D. CLAYTON, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LIMITED DISCOVERY ON CAUSE OF DEATH AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., et al., Defendants. 15 16 CASE NO. C18-0748JLR Before the court is Defendant Syd Carpenter, Marine Contractor, Inc.’s (“Syd 17 Carpenter”) motion to extend the discovery deadline and to allow limited discovery into 18 Plaintiff William R. Clayton’s cause of death. (Mot. (Dkt. # 150).) Plaintiff Jill D. 19 Clayton opposes the motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 151).) Syd Carpenter filed a reply. (Reply 20 (Dkt. # 154).) The court has considered the motion, the submissions in support of and in 21 opposition to the motion, the relevant portions of the record, and the applicable law. 22 ORDER - 1 1 Being fully informed, the court GRANTS Syd Carpenter’s motion, subject to the 2 limitations set forth below. 3 On August 19, 2019, the court granted in part Syd Carpenter’s motion to continue 4 the trial in this case. (See 08/19/19 Order (Dkt. # 148); see also Mot. to Continue (Dkt. 5 # 139); Am. Sched. Order (Dkt. # 149).) The court ordered that “[a]ll pretrial deadlines 6 that have passed will not be rescheduled except that the court allows Syd Carpenter to 7 conduct limited discovery on Mrs. Clayton and the two Clayton heirs on the issue of 8 damages.” (08/19/2019 Order at 2.) The court further stated that “[i]f a party wishes to 9 conduct limited discovery on the issue of Mr. Clayton’s cause of death, the court will 10 entertain a motion on that issue.” (Id. at 2-3.) 11 Syd Carpenter now seeks limited additional discovery on Mr. Clayton’s cause of 12 death. (See Mot. at 1.) Syd Carpenter asserts that this additional discovery is necessary 13 because “Mr. Clayton passed away on May 28, 2019, or five days before discovery 14 closed and approximately two months after expert disclosures [were due].” (Id. at 1; see 15 also Sched. Order (Dkt. # 49) at 1 (setting the discovery deadline to June 3, 2019).) Syd 16 Carpenter argues that because the plaintiffs filed their corrected amended complaint 17 alleges a wrongful death cause of action on August 15, 2019, after the close of discovery, 18 additional discovery is necessary to evaluate “[t]he nature of the damages and claims 19 have changed in light of Mr. Clayton’s passing.” (See Mot. at 2-3 (quoting Mot. to 20 Continue at 1).) 21 Mrs. Clayton responds that there is not good cause for additional discovery 22 because “Syd Carpenter has demonstrated time and time again that delay, not diligence, ORDER - 2 1 is its primary motive” and because Syd Carpenter “seeks unlimited discovery.” (See 2 Resp. at 6-7). Mrs. Clayton also appears to suggest that no discovery on cause of death is 3 necessary because “Mr. Clayton’s death certificate unequivocally listed mesothelioma as 4 his cause of death.” (See id. at 2.) In reply, Syd Carpenter explains that it seeks only 5 limited discovery, and argues that additional discovery on cause of death is necessary to 6 obtain evidence on causation and damages—evidence that should not be limited solely to 7 the death certificate. (See Reply at 2 (“Death certification errors are common.”) (internal 8 quotation omitted).) 9 “A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge's consent.” 10 Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4). The court finds that good cause exists to modify the court’s 11 scheduling order and permit limited discovery on Mr. Clayton’s cause of death. The 12 discovery deadline closed before a wrongful death claim was at issue in this lawsuit. 13 Regardless of whether Syd Carpenter was diligent in pursuing other discovery before the 14 discovery deadline, Syd Carpenter had no notice that it would need discovery on a claim 15 that was not in the case at that time. 16 17 18 The court ORDERS that the current case schedule (see Am. Sched. Order) is amended as follows: The deadline to disclose expert testimony is extended to December 16, 2019, for 19 the sole purpose of allowing the parties to disclose expert reports (or amendments to 20 current expert reports) on Mr. Clayton’s cause of death. The deadline to complete 21 discovery is extended to January 31, 2020, for the following limited purposes only: 22 ORDER - 3 1 • The parties may depose any experts who disclose opinions on Mr. 2 3 Clayton’s cause of death, limited in scope to Mr. Clayton’s cause of death. • The parties may obtain authorization to collect Mr. Clayton’s medical 4 records from April 1, 2019 through May 28, 2019, the date of his death. 5 • The parties may depose Dr. Erina Sugai, M.D., on the sole issue of Mr. 6 Clayton’s cause of death. 7 • The parties may depose individuals who served at the time of Mr. Clayton’s 8 death as his primary care or hospice medical providers. Such depositions 9 shall be limited in scope to Mr. Clayton’s cause of death. 10 Motions related to this additional discovery must be filed by January 10, 2020. 11 Motions challenging expert witness testimony on Mr. Clayton’s cause of death must be 12 filed by February 17, 2020. All other case deadlines as set forth in the court’s modified 13 scheduling order (Am. Sched. Order) remain the same. 14 Dated this 28th day of October, 2019. 15 A 16 17 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?