Jimma v. City of Seattle Police Department
Filing
34
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
ALEMAYEHU JIMMA,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
12
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
NO. C18-0771RSL
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Defendant.
13
14
15
On August 22, 2019, the Court granted defendants’ unopposed motion to stay the trial and
16
related dates pending resolution of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. # 30.
17
Plaintiff timely filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing that he never received the motion and
18
requesting leave to respond. Dkt. # 31. Defendants submitted evidence that the motion to stay
19
was sent to plaintiff via FedEx overnight shipping and left at the “front door” with no signature
20
21
22
required. Dkt. # 33-1 at 2 and Dkt. # 33-2 at 2.
Whether the “front door” mentioned in the tracking documents is the door to plaintiff’s
23
apartment or the main entrance to the apartment building in which he lives is unclear. The Court
24
need not determine whether service was successful, however. The pretrial deadlines were stayed
25
primarily because “[it] is generally more efficient to define the contours of the disputed issues of
26
27
28
fact before the parties draft motions in limine and prepare for trial.” Dkt. # 30 at 1. The Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION - 1
1
has not yet ruled on the pending dispositive motions, and there is no reason to reinstate pretrial
2
deadlines that would compel the parties to undertake significant preparatory efforts without
3
knowing what claims will be tried.
4
5
6
7
8
For all of the foregoing reasons, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
Dated this 26th day of September, 2019.
A
9
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?