Churyumov v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER re Briefing Schedule per parties' 18 Stipulation signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
Case 2:18-cv-00841-RAJ Document 18 Filed 12/06/18 .iaaas 2
1
fi
E
n
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TPIE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
IO OLEG CHURYUMOV,
11
Cl8-0841-RAJ
STIPULATED MOTION AND
Plaintiff,
12
41-m.-.............~ORDER
v.
l3 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
14 IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS),
15
Defendant.
REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
Noted on Motion Calendar:
December 6, 2018
16
17
STIPULATION
18
19
Plaintiff filed this action seeking review of a decision by U.S. Citizenship and
20 Immigration Services ("USCIS"). Dkt. No. 1. The parties agree that Plaintiffs action is brought
21
pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. ยง 702. As such, the parties agree that
22
23
Plaintiffs case is "an action for review on an administrative record," falling under a category of
24
cases in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") 26(a)(l)(E)(i) that are exempt from the
25
requirements set forth in FRCP 26(a) and (f) pertaining to the "lay down" of discovery, the
26
participation of the parties in a discovery conference, and the presentation of a joint discovery
27
28
plan.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
1201 PACIFIC AVE., STE. 700
TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402
(253) 428-3800
Case 2:18-cv-00841-RAJ Document 18 Filed 12/06/18 Page 2 of 5
1
2
3
Plaintiff Oleg Churyumov brings his action against Defendant USCIS and alleges that:
"on February 22, 2016, he submitted his Form i-140 (petition for visa of a person with
extraordinary ability) to USCIS. Then, USCIS denied his petition. Plaintiff believes this denial
4
5
was unlawful." Complaint, Dkt. No. 1, III Statement of Claim. As relief, "Plaintiff asks this
6
Court to revoke the USCIS decision and approve Plaintiffs i-140 form." See id. at IV, Relief.
7
Defendant USCIS has answered the complaint. See Answer, Dkt. No. 9.
8
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court accept and approve this
9
10
11
Stipulation, in lieu of a joint status report pursuant to the Court's Order dated November 15,
2018. See Order, Dkt. No. 17. The parties have agreed to the following proposed briefing
12 schedule for the filing of summary judgment motions and any responses thereto:
13
1. Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment, which must not exceed twenty-
14
15
16
four pages, no later than March 21, 2019 and note it on the motion calendar for May
10, 2019;
17
2. Defendant shall file its combined response and cross motion for summary judgment,
18
which must not exceed twenty-four pages, no later than April 18, 2019 and note it on
19
the motion calendar for May 10, 2019;
20
21
22
23
24
3. Plaintiff shall file his combined response to Defendant's cross motion and reply to
Plaintiffs' motion, which must not exceed twelve pages, no later than May 10, 2019.
4. Defendant shall file its reply, which must not exceed twelve pages, in support of its
cross motion no later than May 10, 2019.
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
120 I PACIFIC A VE., STE. 700
TACOMA, WASIDNGTON98402
(253) 428-3800
Case 2:18-cv-00841-RAJ Document 18 Filed 12/06/18 Page 4 of 5
ORDER
1
2
3
4
The parties having so stipulated, IT IS ORDERED that the parties will comply with the
above stipulated briefing schedule.
5
Dated thi(tJ"'day of _
6
7
8
9
_;:~ 2018.
=::...._;;;;.......~----''
C2ll
Richard A Jones
United States District Jud~
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
1201 PACIFIC A\'E. , STE. 700
TACOMA, WASHJNGTON98402
(253) 428-3800
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?