Barth v. Christiansen et al

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendations. The DOC's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 12 ) is GRANTED, and all claims asserted against the DOC are dismissed, with prejudice, for failure of plaintiff to state any cognizable claim for relief against this defendant. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 NICKOLAS J. BARTH, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 Case No. C18-897-RAJ-JPD v. PATRICIA CHRISTIANSEN, et al., ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 13 14 15 The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, the motion of the Washington 16 Department of Corrections (“DOC”) to dismiss all claims asserted against it in this action, the 17 Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate 18 Judge, any objections thereto, and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS: 19 (1) The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted. 20 (2) The DOC’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 12) is GRANTED, and all claims asserted 21 against the DOC are dismissed, with prejudice, for failure of plaintiff to state any cognizable 22 claim for relief against this defendant. 23 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS - 1 1 2 3 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for defendants, and to the Honorable James P. Donohue. DATED this 20th day of December, 2018. 4 A 5 6 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?