City of Issaquah v. ORA Talus 90, LLC et al

Filing 134

ORDER re the parties' 133 Stipulated Motion. The Court GRANTS parties' stipulated motion and ORDERS that discovery-related deadlines are continued as set forth in the Court's forthcoming scheduling order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)

Case 2:18-cv-00910-RSM Document 134 Filed 01/08/21 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8
9

CITY OF ISSAQUAH, a municipal
corporation,
Plaintiff,

10
v.
11
12
13

ORA TALUS 90, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company; and RESMARK EQUITY
PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Defendants.

14
15
16

ORA TALUS 90, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company; and RESMARK EQUITY
PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Third-Party Plaintiffs,

17
v.
18
19
20
21

TERRA TALUS LLC, a Washington limited
liability company; ELEMENT RESIDENTIAL
INC., a Washington corporation; JOSHUA
FREED, an individual; J.R. HAYES & SONS,
INC., a Washington corporation; TERRA
ASSOCIATES, INC., a Washington
corporation; TALUS MANAGEMENT
SERVICES LLC, a Washington limited

22
23

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATED
MOTION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERYRELATED DEADLINES
PAGE - 1

NO. 18-CV-00910 RSM
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE
DISCOVERY-RELATED DEADLINES

Case 2:18-cv-00910-RSM Document 134 Filed 01/08/21 Page 2 of 3

1

liability company; and TALUS 7&8, LLC, a
Washington limited liability company,

2
3
4

Third-Party Defendants.
TALUS 7&8 INVESTMENT, LLC, a
Washington limited liability company; J.R.
HAYES & SONS, INC., a Washington
corporation,

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Fourth-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
KULCHIN FOUNDATION DRILLING
COMPANY, a Washington corporation, and
BIG MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISE LLC, a
Washington limited liability company,
Fourth-Party Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND
CROSSCLAIMS
ANDREW ALTIERI
Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY,
et al.,

15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21

This matter comes before the Court on parties’ stipulated motion to continue
discovery-related deadlines by approximately 30 days. Dkt. #133. Pursuant to LCR 16(b)(6),
parties move to continue the discovery-related deadlines due to the number of parties and
counsel, the complexity of the facts and issues involved in the case, the volume of documents

22
23

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATED
MOTION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERYRELATED DEADLINES
PAGE - 2

Case 2:18-cv-00910-RSM Document 134 Filed 01/08/21 Page 3 of 3

1

recently produced, the number of expert witness depositions still to be scheduled, and the

2

extensive delays resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Id. at 4.

3

Finding that good cause exists to extend the deadlines, the Court GRANTS parties’

4

stipulated motion and ORDERS that discovery-related deadlines are continued as set forth in the

5

Court’s forthcoming scheduling order.

6
7

DATED this 8th day of January, 2021.

8
9
10

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ STIPULATED
MOTION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERYRELATED DEADLINES
PAGE - 3